2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-021-02106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-effects height–diameter models for black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DH positively and significantly correlated with the asymptote coefficient of the candidate model. Our results are consistent with those of many previous studies [5,17,21,46] that used dominant height as an additional stand-level predictor variable associated with the asymptote coefficient. This could be expected, as DH is a measure of the stand's maximum height potential, which is usually associated with the site productivity and the site index [47].…”
Section: Basic and Generalized H-d Modelssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…DH positively and significantly correlated with the asymptote coefficient of the candidate model. Our results are consistent with those of many previous studies [5,17,21,46] that used dominant height as an additional stand-level predictor variable associated with the asymptote coefficient. This could be expected, as DH is a measure of the stand's maximum height potential, which is usually associated with the site productivity and the site index [47].…”
Section: Basic and Generalized H-d Modelssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This could be expected, as DH is a measure of the stand's maximum height potential, which is usually associated with the site productivity and the site index [47]. DH is a result of the competition process present in the stand, the stand density [17], and the stand quality [5,46]. Although significant correlation between the coefficients and the stand-level predictor variables such as the Age, the N and the BA was detected, adding other stand-level predictor variables did not increase the model performances significantly.…”
Section: Basic and Generalized H-d Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Huang et al 2009). Further, research on this topic showed that the inclusion of dominant height and dominant diameter as predictors can improved the accuracy of h-d models (Hanus et al 1999;Crecente-Campo et al 2010;Raptis et al 2021) Different combinations of mixed parameters from equation (1) were implemented (Table 2). The results of Table 2 shows that model (1) with random components 1 and 3 produced the lowest values of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) (Akaike 1974) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) among various combinations of mixed parameters.…”
Section: Nonlinear Regression Models (Generalized Models Fixed-and Mixed-effects Models)mentioning
confidence: 99%