2012
DOI: 10.1515/1557-4679.1426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Effects Joint Models with Skew-Normal Distribution for HIV Dynamic Response with Missing and Mismeasured Time-Varying Covariate

Abstract: Longitudinal data arise frequently in medical studies and it is a common practice to analyze such complex data with nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) models, which enable us to account for between-subject and within-subject variations. To partially explain the variations, time-dependent covariates are usually introduced to these models. Some covariates, however, may be often measured with substantial errors and missing observations. It is often the case that model random error is assumed to be distributed normall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang and Dagne developed a skew‐normal nonlinear mixed‐effects (NLME) joint model for longitudinal data with skewness and mismeasured covariates. A semiparametric NLME joint model has also been studied to deal with longitudinal data with skewness, missing responses, and measurement errors in covariates . Lu and Huang proposed a mixed‐effects varying coefficient joint model to study the multiple data features in longitudinal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and Dagne developed a skew‐normal nonlinear mixed‐effects (NLME) joint model for longitudinal data with skewness and mismeasured covariates. A semiparametric NLME joint model has also been studied to deal with longitudinal data with skewness, missing responses, and measurement errors in covariates . Lu and Huang proposed a mixed‐effects varying coefficient joint model to study the multiple data features in longitudinal data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the mean regression-based NLME models [9,10,16,11,7,39] only quantify the viral dynamics and treatment effects at the average of the viral load observations, and thus cannot detect such quantile differences.…”
Section: Data Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally assumed that λ 1 > λ 2 , which assures that the model is identifiable and is appropriate for empirical studies [3]. It was noted that equation (8) can be only applied to the early segment or longer term of the viral load response with decreasing trajectory patterns [3,39]. However, we noted in Figure 1(c) that for some patients viral loads increase at the later period, indicating that the second-phase viral decay rate λ 2 may vary over time and negative values of the second-phase decay rate may correspond to viral increase and lead to viral rebound [3]; it suggests that variation in the dynamic parameters, particularly λ 2 , may be partially associated with time-varying covariates such as repeated CD4 cell counts.…”
Section: Specification Of Models For Hiv Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally assumed that 1 > 2 in (13), which assures that the model is identifiable and is appropriate for empirical studies [2]. Models (12) and (13) offer almost equal performance to capture the early fast-decaying segment of viral load trajectory [34], but model (13) performs better for a long term of viral load trajectory [35]. It was noted that both models can be only applied to the early segment or longer term of the viral load response with decreasing trajectory patterns as discussed in Section 1 and shown in Figure 1(a)(two solid and two dashed lines).…”
Section: Data Description and Component Specification Of Mixture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%