2005
DOI: 10.3166/reef.14.287-304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed finite element formulation in large deformation frictional contact problem

Abstract: ABSTRACT. This paper presents a mixed variational framework and numerical examples to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the mortar approach to drive the communication between different (incompatible) meshes. This mortar concept has been successfully extended to the variational inequalities in [5] for linear finite elements and employed in many computations; we refer for instance to [3,20,26,32,37,38,43]. The convergence rates established in this paper for the quadratic finite elements are similar to those already stated in [4,27,28] when matching grids are employed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the mortar approach to drive the communication between different (incompatible) meshes. This mortar concept has been successfully extended to the variational inequalities in [5] for linear finite elements and employed in many computations; we refer for instance to [3,20,26,32,37,38,43]. The convergence rates established in this paper for the quadratic finite elements are similar to those already stated in [4,27,28] when matching grids are employed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A literature exists on the linear mortar finite element method for the Signorini problem. We refer to [3,5,25,26,42] without being exhaustive. Users are recommended not to enforce the unilateral conditions on the discrete solution before running the mortar projection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been demonstrated to be robust [40]. The advantage of using the Lagrange multipliers is that the contact laws introduced above are strictly verified, which is primordial for the modeling of contact dynamics generated by the CAN.…”
Section: Contacting Interface Modeling and Contact Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, many attempts have been developed to deal with such problems using the finite element method. In most cases, the difficulty caused by the nondifferentiability of contact and friction laws is resolved with either a method of regularization, such as penalization or augmented Lagrangian [21,34], or a mixed method [20,3].Moreover, the spatial discretization of the problem produces difficulties at level of the calculation of mechanical contact. Evaluating the quantities involved in the equations of mechanical contact is difficult when the two boundaries are discretized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%