2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed forest specific calibration of the 3-PGmix model parameters from site observations to predict post-fire forest regrowth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, most of the research related to optimization theory in forest canopies focuses on the utilization of resources (light, water) by trees [ 60 ]. For instance, some plot-level models have also been used to estimate the photosynthetic capacity of the entire forest canopy in order to maximize its photosynthetic efficiency [ 61 , 62 ]. Similarly, previous studies have analyzed the impact of different loquat tree structures on light interception from the perspective of radiation transfer using a 3D loquat tree structure combined with a radiative transfer model, providing insights for cultivar breeding [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, most of the research related to optimization theory in forest canopies focuses on the utilization of resources (light, water) by trees [ 60 ]. For instance, some plot-level models have also been used to estimate the photosynthetic capacity of the entire forest canopy in order to maximize its photosynthetic efficiency [ 61 , 62 ]. Similarly, previous studies have analyzed the impact of different loquat tree structures on light interception from the perspective of radiation transfer using a 3D loquat tree structure combined with a radiative transfer model, providing insights for cultivar breeding [ 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the subsequent model calibration, simulated patterns emerging at the stand scale were compared to time series of independent data to determine the values of five parameters. A common procedure for parameter selection would have been to conduct a sensitivity analysis (e.g., Huber et al, 2018;Lagarrigues et al, 2015;Lin et al, 2022). Instead, we selected parameters that we deemed important to tie the model even more strongly to empirical data but for which we were unable to make an assessment in the sense of parameterization (cf.…”
Section: Model Parameterization and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During calibration, the parameter values were adjusted iteratively and simultaneously "by hand", similar to the calibration procedure by Pabst et al (2008) with ZELIG andRisch et al (2005) with ForClim. We deliberately decided against more sophisticated calibration procedures such as parameter optimization (e.g., Lin et al, 2022;Mina et al, 2016) or Bayesian approaches (e.g., Cailleret et al, 2020;Forrester et al, 2021a;Lagarrigues et al, 2015;van Oijen et al, 2013) that would arguably have led to a closer fit of model results to the data. We had only rather few stand records per stratum available for calibration, which in some cases also lacked information on certain processes relevant to calibration, such as almost no records of sycamore maple or no new regeneration appearing in the stands of the HM zone.…”
Section: Model Parameterization and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining forest inventory data with remote sensing technology, the spatial inversion of forest carbon stock can effectively integrate the accuracy of field measurements and the spatial distribution information obtained through remote sensing [7,8]. Previous studies have demonstrated the significant influence of geographic and climatic factors on the spatial distribution of forest carbon stock [9,10], as well as the variation in carbon sequestration capabilities among different tree species and forest ages [11,12]. In addition, the landscape pattern and heterogeneity of forests are closely related to ecological functions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%