2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12239-018-0031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Harmonic Runnable Scheduling for Automotive Software on Multi-Core Processors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our best knowledge, [12] is the unique research work addressed APS method for a multi-core architecture with a limitation (hypothesis) of only one task per core. The authors in [8] use least-loaded (LL) algorithm proposed by [12] to scheduling a mixed harmonic runnable set to one task per core.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our best knowledge, [12] is the unique research work addressed APS method for a multi-core architecture with a limitation (hypothesis) of only one task per core. The authors in [8] use least-loaded (LL) algorithm proposed by [12] to scheduling a mixed harmonic runnable set to one task per core.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common optimization goals are stack memory usage [11,12] using genetic algorithms and scheduling algorithms, core load balancing [11], inter-communication overhead [13,14] using integer linear programming (ILP), data consistency using ILP and heuristic methods [15], and deadline violation [16,17] using genetic algorithms and the greedy heuristic approach for system resource clustering. Other work proposes regrouping runnables with arbitrary periods on the same task using a greedy heuristic approach combined with linear cost function and schedulability test [18,19]. This approach may lead to a minimum number of executors needed to schedule overloaded systems while minimizing the stack memory usage and context switch overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third algorithm used for comparison is the least loaded (LL) heuristic approach, used in [18]. The approach applies a deadline test schedulability similar to the one used in this paper along with a heuristic approach of least load to design the cost function, and defines the sequencing order of callbacks inside the executor with a complexity of O(n 2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%