“…Similar to the analysis in the Proof of Theorem 3.1, one can obtain the above results of Corollary 3.1. ,J j > 0 j = (1, 2, 3, 4),Z 1 > 0,Z 2 > 0,Z 1i > 0,Z 2i > 0 ,T > 0,T i > 0 ,Λ * jp j = (1, 2, .., m), p = (1, 2, ..., 2m + 3l + q + 10),N 1i ,N 2i ,N 4i ,M i1 ,M i2 ,M i3 ,M i4 ,P 1 , P 2 ,H 1 , H 2 ,Q 1 , Q 2 , positive definite diagonal matrices K 1 , K 2 , L 1 , L 2 such that (12)- (14),(16)-(17) and the following LMIs hold…”