2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed logical dynamical modeling and hybrid model predictive control of public transport operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This avoids the need to resort to an indirect proxy, such as e.g. bus spacings [28], to enforce headway regularity. Indeed, this particular proxy might not be adapted to certain settings, such as a route with a non-homogeneous distribution of bus stops.…”
Section: Bus Stops and Passengersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This avoids the need to resort to an indirect proxy, such as e.g. bus spacings [28], to enforce headway regularity. Indeed, this particular proxy might not be adapted to certain settings, such as a route with a non-homogeneous distribution of bus stops.…”
Section: Bus Stops and Passengersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PI-controller: This controller operates along the same lines as the PI-controller presented in [28]. The main difference here is that instead of spacing errors, we consider the error between the current position of a given bus and the shifted position of the preceding bus.…”
Section: B Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, one bus is selected and its individual energy consumption is analyzed with different control strategies. In Figure 12 four bus trajectories are compared: holding control, PI control [48], energy-aware cheap control (d), and advanced balanced velocity control (f). The two benchmark control strategies (HCS and PI control) perform similarly in this metric as none of them considers energy consumption.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate different transit control strategies, [95] compares eight scenarios in two different approaches from three dimensions: bus capacities, service frequencies and load profiles. Also, a hybrid dynamic model of a single bus line is presented with a dual objective of regularizing spacings and improving bus service speed [96]. To further improve the bus operation efficiency, many bus signal priority strategies have also been proposed [97][98] [99].…”
Section: Urban Transit Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%