Rethinking the Case Study in International Business and Management Research 2011
DOI: 10.4337/9780857933461.00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-method Case Studies in International Business Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…how companies in Norway comply with the language requirement of the Norwegian Accounting Act Article 3-4. The qualitative and quantitative data included in this study were analysed in two separate rounds, which corresponds to the compartmentalised strategy for mixed method research described by Hurmerinta & Nummela (2011). A compartmentalised strategy implies that the different types of data are analysed in a sequential order of methods, which means that the qualitative and quantitative data were analysed within their own tradition (Hurmerinta & Nummela 2011:218).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how companies in Norway comply with the language requirement of the Norwegian Accounting Act Article 3-4. The qualitative and quantitative data included in this study were analysed in two separate rounds, which corresponds to the compartmentalised strategy for mixed method research described by Hurmerinta & Nummela (2011). A compartmentalised strategy implies that the different types of data are analysed in a sequential order of methods, which means that the qualitative and quantitative data were analysed within their own tradition (Hurmerinta & Nummela 2011:218).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires flexibility to allow change in future research direction. There is a tendency to continuously change the method to suit the emerging theme and reformulate the problematisation, which, in the worst case, may lead to abandoning cases and starting all over again (Hurmerinta & Nummela, 2011). Therefore, although this study advocates the use of multi-method field studies for future IMA, again, researchers must consider whether this method is the best way to answer the research question(s).…”
Section: Innovation In Research Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Analysis of average CPY (61.43) reveals that adopting multi-method qualitative field studies that combine interviews with questionnaires is significant. One plausible reason is conducting multi-method research may add more value to the findings (Brannen, 1996) and should result in answering more complicated research questions (Hurmerinta & Nummela, 2011). Therefore, combining qualitative and quantitative data to analyse MA practice also has impact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analyses, the value categories or scale levels (Likert scale) of variables were combined if needed. The original text was retained and utilised in parallel with the categorised variables (for more about mixed methods in case studies, see Hurmerinta & Nummela, 2011). The numerical presentation of data is accompanied by quotations to enliven and clarify the analysis and interpretation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%