Mixed Methods

Myers, Karen K.; Powers, Samantha Rae

doi:10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc143

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It will provide a breadth and depth to understand the phenomena that neither qualitative nor quantitative approaches alone could support in answering the research questions. The qualitative phase is able to explain further, validate, and triangulate the quantitative study results [97,98]. In addition, through R² analysis, only 58.1% of the drivers for I4.0 adaptation were explained by the shared effects of BC, CS, and OI.…”

Section: Conclusion Limitations and Recommendations For Future Studymentioning

confidence: 89%

Unveiling Key Drivers of Industry 4.0 Adaptation in CKD Automotive Manufacturing Companies: Evidence From Asia and South America

Aripin,

Mezhuyev,

Nawanir

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper investigates the drivers of Industry 4.0 adaptation in the CKD automotive industry. The methodology is based on a cross-sectional empirical study, where the samples were drawn using simple random sampling. Four hypotheses were developed, and the data were collected using an online survey and a standardised questionnaire. Survey responses were received from white-collar employees at a CKD automotive manufacturer encompassing multiple CKD plants in Asia and South America. One hundred fifty survey responses were received and next analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in SmartPLS software. Based on the findings, three drivers, namely, business competitiveness, customer satisfaction, and operational improvement, positively affect the Industry 4.0 adaptation in CKD manufacturing companies. However, the financial benefit factor does not affect the adaptation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing industries. This study contributes to the existing knowledge in understanding the drivers for Industry 4.0 adaptation. In addition, these findings might aid the practitioners and government in tailoring the policy related to Industry 4.0 in CKD automotive manufacturing industries.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion Limitations and Recommendations For Future Studymentioning

confidence: 89%

Unveiling Key Drivers of Industry 4.0 Adaptation in CKD Automotive Manufacturing Companies: Evidence From Asia and South America

Aripin,

Mezhuyev,

Nawanir

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, further study could extend this study using a mixed-method approach. Applying both methods will contribute significantly in providing a holistic view and it provides a breadth and depth to the understanding of phenomena that neither qualitative nor quantitative research approaches alone could support to answer the research questions [136,137]. Only 46.7% of the sustaining factors of lean manufacturing are explained by the shared effects of lean leadership, lead culture, lean supplier management, and lean knowledge management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustenance Strategies for Lean Manufacturing Implementation in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries

Mohd Aripin,

Nawanir,

Hussain

et al. 2024

Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to investigate the relationship between sustaining factors and lean manufacturing implementation. This survey-based study was a cross-sectional study and the samples were drawn by using cluster sampling procedure from medium and large manufacturing companies based on the Federation of Manufacturers Malaysia (FMM) with the final number of 151 respondents. In total, four hypotheses were developed and tested statically using PLS-SEM through SmartPLS software. The result provided evidence that lean culture, lean leadership, and lean knowledge management have a positive relationship on lean manufacturing implementation. However, lean supplier management does not have a positive relationship on lean manufacturing implementation. The survey was responded by middle and top-level management from the discrete manufacturing industries. Although there is growing interest in empirical shreds of evidence in favor of sustaining lean, this study provides a comprehensive view of sustaining factors for lean manufacturing implementation. Hence, this study contributes to expanding the boundary of the existing literature and contributes to the body of knowledge while providing insights to practitioners in tailoring strategies to sustain lean manufacturing implementation and leverage their performance.

show abstract

“…As reported by Myers and Powers [25], a mixed-methods approach allows for a deeper and broader perspective of the phenomena researched, formulates the problem statement more clearly, and finds the best way to approach it, both theoretically and practically, by producing varied data through a multiplicity of observations. The methodology is designed to gather differentiated but rich data considering the limited sample.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Case Study to Explore a UDL Evaluation Framework Based on MOOCs

Iniesto

Rodrigo

Hillaire³

2022

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we focus on 23 undergraduate students’ application of a universal design for learning (UDL) evaluation framework for assessing a massive open online course (MOOC) in the context of a usability and accessibility university course. Using a mixed-methods approach, we first report the extent to which untrained raters agree when evaluating their course with the framework and then examine their feedback on using UDL for assessment purposes. Our results indicate user feedback provides great value for both the future development of accessible MOOCs and identifies opportunities to improve the evaluation framework. For that purpose, we suggest an iterative process comprised of refining the framework while working with students and which could help students to internalise UDL principles and guidelines to become expert learners and evaluators. The complexities and redundancies that surfaced in our research, as reported in this paper, illustrate that there is variability in the perception of both the course design and the interpretation of the framework. Results indicate that UDL cannot be applied as a list of simple checkpoints, but also provide insights into aspects of the framework that can be improved to make the framework itself more accessible to students.

show abstract

Mixed Methods

Cited by 6 publications

References 12 publications

Unveiling Key Drivers of Industry 4.0 Adaptation in CKD Automotive Manufacturing Companies: Evidence From Asia and South America

Unveiling Key Drivers of Industry 4.0 Adaptation in CKD Automotive Manufacturing Companies: Evidence From Asia and South America

Sustenance Strategies for Lean Manufacturing Implementation in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries

A Case Study to Explore a UDL Evaluation Framework Based on MOOCs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About