2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed mode dynamic crack-fiber bundle interaction using caustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pa ≠1 (Gan, 1964) is the optical stress constant for glass; d = 0.005 m is thickness of the specimen in the transmitted caustic; z 0 = 3.12 m is the distance between the reference plane and the specimen plane; " = 3.17 (Yao et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007) is a correction factor that o sets the shape distortion in the caustics; F (V ) ¥ 1 is the typical correction factor used for all practical crack velocities V (Yao et al, 2003;Hao et al, 2016a). The dynamic stress intensity factor of the crack tip at time t is obtained by measuring the transverse diameter of the caustics D(t).…”
Section: Measurement Of the Dynamic Stress Intensity Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pa ≠1 (Gan, 1964) is the optical stress constant for glass; d = 0.005 m is thickness of the specimen in the transmitted caustic; z 0 = 3.12 m is the distance between the reference plane and the specimen plane; " = 3.17 (Yao et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007) is a correction factor that o sets the shape distortion in the caustics; F (V ) ¥ 1 is the typical correction factor used for all practical crack velocities V (Yao et al, 2003;Hao et al, 2016a). The dynamic stress intensity factor of the crack tip at time t is obtained by measuring the transverse diameter of the caustics D(t).…”
Section: Measurement Of the Dynamic Stress Intensity Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Numerous studies have addressed the brittle fracture behavior of interfaces in layered material, including theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, and experimental studies. [40][41][42][43][44] The effect of mismatching elastic moduli of the host materials on the interface cracking, macroscopic deformation, and failure characteristics are the main factors considered in these studies. Micro-fracture parameters of the moving crack in layered materials and the effect of interface strength properties on the interface crack behavior require further study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the numerical model is verified by the experimental results. Although many papers in the existing literature already addressed this subject with very similar experimental or numerical approaches, 44,45 there are relatively few systematic studies on the influence of the mechanical properties and structural characteristics of the interface on layered materials. In addition, the numerical calculation in this paper not only makes use of the computational advantages of CDEM in crack problems but also introduces the theoretical calculation formula of spring stiffness into the CDEM calculation framework for the first time, which solves the disadvantages of the empirical value of spring stiffness in traditional CDEM and FDEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the compression deformation increased, the material fracture toughness was enhanced, and the brittle-toughness transition occurred. Wenfeng Hao et al [14] conducted a dynamic caustics test using fibre bundles of different thicknesses and showed that the fibre bundle shielded the stress intensity factor and crack propagation speed at the crack tip. As the fibre bundle thickness increased, the shielding effect gradually increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%