2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11045-019-00683-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed near-field and far-field source localization revised: propagation loss included

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following approximation models are considered: (a) Exact phase model without gain attenuation. (b) Fresnel phase approximation with gain attenuation. (c) Fresnel phase approximation without gain attenuation. The above model (c) has been widely used in designing near‐field source localisation algorithms. Only lately, the model (b) has been used for mixed source localisation [37 ], and model (a) has been used to provide an optimal planar array design for near‐field localisation [38 ]. We use these models only for the purpose of evaluating the effect of model mismatch on algorithms.…”
Section: Variants For Approximation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following approximation models are considered: (a) Exact phase model without gain attenuation. (b) Fresnel phase approximation with gain attenuation. (c) Fresnel phase approximation without gain attenuation. The above model (c) has been widely used in designing near‐field source localisation algorithms. Only lately, the model (b) has been used for mixed source localisation [37 ], and model (a) has been used to provide an optimal planar array design for near‐field localisation [38 ]. We use these models only for the purpose of evaluating the effect of model mismatch on algorithms.…”
Section: Variants For Approximation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%