Recent Advances in Experimental Mechanics 2002
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48410-2_52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Numerical-experimental Techniques: Past, Present and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The average sensitivities of the in-plane stiffness properties for the contact analyses are larger than for the eigenfrequency analyses, especially for propeller 90. In contrast to what is stated in [5] that advocates the use of static data in the MNET.…”
Section: Sensitivity Studymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• The average sensitivities of the in-plane stiffness properties for the contact analyses are larger than for the eigenfrequency analyses, especially for propeller 90. In contrast to what is stated in [5] that advocates the use of static data in the MNET.…”
Section: Sensitivity Studymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This special application of inverse methods is known as a mixed numerical-experimental technique (MNET). Since the nineties many papers have been published on the application of MNET's for mechanical problems, but can be used for any other field if an accurate and sensitive experimental method is available and a good theoretical model exist [5]. Many different approaches are presented in literature for model updating by using MNET's, see for instance the references made in [6], [7], [8] and [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation