2020
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed sand–mud bedforms produced by transient turbulent flows in the fringe of submarine fans: Indicators of flow transformation

Abstract: The fringe of fine‐grained deep‐marine systems often exhibits complex sedimentary facies and facies associations, because the presence of clay promotes the development of transient turbulent flows with complex depositional properties. Relatively little is known about the variation of current‐induced sedimentary structures found within these facies. This study provides the first comprehensive description and interpretation of mixed sandstone–mudstone bedforms observed in the fringe of the mud‐rich submarine fan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar apparently homogeneous mudstones from other basin-floor successions are also commonly interpreted as hemipelagites (e.g. Hesse 1975;Mutti 1977;Stow and Piper 1984;Baker and Baas 2020). However, basin-floor background deposits are usually highly bioturbated in distal (yet well-oxygenated) basinfloor environments, due to relatively low depositional energy, leading to destruction of the primary sedimentary fabric (e.g.…”
Section: Depositional Processes In Distal Basin-floor Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar apparently homogeneous mudstones from other basin-floor successions are also commonly interpreted as hemipelagites (e.g. Hesse 1975;Mutti 1977;Stow and Piper 1984;Baker and Baas 2020). However, basin-floor background deposits are usually highly bioturbated in distal (yet well-oxygenated) basinfloor environments, due to relatively low depositional energy, leading to destruction of the primary sedimentary fabric (e.g.…”
Section: Depositional Processes In Distal Basin-floor Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Normally graded mudstones are commonly reported as deposits of distal basin-floor fan successions (e.g. Hesse 1975;Pickering 1981;Etienne et al 2012;Grundvåg et al 2014;Baker and Baas 2020;Pickering et al 2020). These deposits may represent the distal expression of sediment gravity flows that deposited their sand fraction in more proximal slope or basin-floor environments.…”
Section: Depositional Processes In Distal Basin-floor Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relatively high proportion of debrites on the basin-floor mudstones of the deep-water Laingsburg succession is consistent with a distal position, more prone to flow transformations from turbulent to laminar (e.g., Haughton et al, 2003;Talling et al, 2004;Hodgson, 2009;Kane et al, 2017;Baker and Baas, 2020). The high mud content on the seafloor during the interpreted relative sea-level highstand periods in the Karoo Basin (Flint et al, 2011) and its incorporation in sediment gravity-flows may have favoured flow transformations by enhancing the damping of flow turbulence (Baas and Best, 2002;Baas et al, 2011).…”
Section: Basin-floor Mudstonesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Some of the mudstone clasts are relatively well rounded ( Figure 8A, B), which suggest progressive disintegration and abrasion in sediment gravity flows with a component of turbulence (e.g., Haughton et al, 2003;Fonnesu et al, 2015;Boulesteix et al, 2019). Therefore, we propose that some of the massive mudstones (F3) may represent the distal expression of flows that underwent transformation from turbulent to laminar along their flow path (e.g., Baas et al, 2011;Kane et al, 2017;Baker and Baas, 2020). The intense to complete bioturbation of F3 suggests deposition under lower sedimentation rate compared to F1 and F2, associated with a relatively low frequency of flow events (e.g., Wetzel, 1984;Heard and Pickering, 2008;Gingras et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%