1971
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690170340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing and product distribution for a liquid‐phase, second‐order, competitive‐consecutive reaction

Abstract: 1 V 1 = absolute value (magnitude) of oscillation in vapor X B = bottoms composition, mole fraction water X D = distillate composition, mole fraction water X F = feed composition, mole fraction water T~ = linear time constant, min.boilup McGraw-Hill, New York (1963). TN = nonlinear time constant, min. p = slope of Tc versus V line between limits on Tc w = frequency, rad./min.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If more than one reaction occurs simultaneously, then interactions between turbulence enhanced mixing and reaction become very important, since it is recognized that selectivity to specific products is a strong function of mixing rate (Patterson, 1985). That complex reactions are strongly affected by the mixing intensity has been noted by other investigators such as Paul and Treybal (1971) and Cheng and Tookey (1978).…”
Section: A + B + Rmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If more than one reaction occurs simultaneously, then interactions between turbulence enhanced mixing and reaction become very important, since it is recognized that selectivity to specific products is a strong function of mixing rate (Patterson, 1985). That complex reactions are strongly affected by the mixing intensity has been noted by other investigators such as Paul and Treybal (1971) and Cheng and Tookey (1978).…”
Section: A + B + Rmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…November 1995 Paul and Treybal (1971) studied the product distribution for a homogenous, liquid phase, series-parallel reaction and found that the reaction rate and/or the product distribution may be influenced by mixing if the course of the reaction is influenced by concentration. Based on laboratory measurements of the yield of the diazo-coupling reactions in a CSTR, Bourne et al (1978Bourne et al ( , 1981 observed that the product distribution from fast, series-parallel reactions, depends upon the stoichiometric ratio, the volumetric ratio of the reagent solution, the location of the feed point, the backmixing into the feed pipe, the operating mode of the reactor, the viscosity of the solutions, the type, diameter and rotation speed of the impeller, and the concentrations of the feed solution and concentrations in the tank.…”
Section: Aiche Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher concentrations of R occur in the contact region between reactants A and B, with regions rich in R delimiting the B-rich regions. When spatial inhomogeneity of A and B concentrations occur, excess of B in the presence of A yields R that is later consumed into S. This is clearly the case, with the local maximum regions of B overlapping for the three segregated injection schemes with local deficit regions of R. Such general behavior for the case of a fast consecutive competitive reaction system was noted and qualitatively discussed by Levenspiel 2 and Bourne and Toor, with subsequent experimental studies 51,52 and DNS simulations confirming the general validity of this observation. 53 The experimental selectivity in S profiles, shown in Figure 10, presents maximum values at the central exit channel.…”
Section: Comparison With the Netmix V R Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was first reported in the 1950s. [6][7][8] Since then much research has been devoted to the subject of mixing in different systems, [9][10][11] including multiphase flows 2,3,12,13 that are the focus of this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%