2010
DOI: 10.1021/ie100466h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing Effects in Cellulase-Mediated Hydrolysis of Cellulose for Bio-Ethanol Production

Abstract: Conversion of cellulose to glucose is the rate-limiting step in converting biomass into fuel. In this paper, we explore the effects of micro-and macro-mixing on the enzymatic hydrolysis of various cellulosic substrates to glucose by using a spatially averaged low-dimensional CSTR model. We quantify the effects of mixing on glucose yield, cellulose depolymerization rate and the synergy between the enzymes. We conclude that micromixing limitations provide an important mechanism to increase yield, reduce the domi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the absence of complete data, we consider an equal probability of formation any chain i from any longer chain length j ( i < j ), and we use the term 2/( j – 1) in this model. The factor 2 accounts for the formation of the fractions j and ( i – j ), and the fractions ( i – j ) and j , from a chain length i . , …”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the absence of complete data, we consider an equal probability of formation any chain i from any longer chain length j ( i < j ), and we use the term 2/( j – 1) in this model. The factor 2 accounts for the formation of the fractions j and ( i – j ), and the fractions ( i – j ) and j , from a chain length i . , …”
Section: Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor 2 accounts for the formation of the fractions j and (i − j), and the fractions (i − j) and j, from a chain length i. 20,21 The rates of the formation of hemicelluloses of chain length i (i ≥ 12) in the solid phase are…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gaikwad and Chakraborty, 2013); what is the optimally mixed reactor configuration for enzymatic hydrolysis in continuous systems? (Chakraborty et al, 2010);(c) what is the optimal reactor mixing strategy for batch hydrolysis of cellulose? (Pal and Chakraborty, 2013);(d) what are the optimal mixing and temperature conditions for catalytic conversion of cellulose to biofuels in ionic liquid media?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we have discussed through model simulations how mixing limitations can offset inhibition, and increase yield as well as the rate of formation of desired product when the cellulose hydrolysis is performed in CSTRs. 32 We also suggested a novel reactor configuration of two CSTRs in series (with reasonable macromixing) with minimal local mixing/ micromixing in each tank and glucose removal at the exit of the first tank as the optimum reactor configuration for maximizing glucose yield. 32 We also performed modeling studies on cellulase-mediated hydrolysis of cellulose in batch reactors, in which enzyme diffusivity, two-site binding of the substrate, both solid and the soluble part of the substrate, degree of synergy between the enzymes, etc., were considered.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 We also suggested a novel reactor configuration of two CSTRs in series (with reasonable macromixing) with minimal local mixing/ micromixing in each tank and glucose removal at the exit of the first tank as the optimum reactor configuration for maximizing glucose yield. 32 We also performed modeling studies on cellulase-mediated hydrolysis of cellulose in batch reactors, in which enzyme diffusivity, two-site binding of the substrate, both solid and the soluble part of the substrate, degree of synergy between the enzymes, etc., were considered. 33 This article presents a tightly coupled experimental and theoretical study on the effect of mixing on Avicel hydrolysis in batch reactors.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%