2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2003.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing in a fluid jet agitated tank: effects of jet angle and elevation and number of jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The horizontal inlet orientation resulted in the best hydraulic efficiency. Previous studies considering mixing time have also observed the influence of inlet orientation on hydraulic efficiency (Maruyama et al 1982;Dakshinamoorthy et al 2006;Zughbi and Rakib 2004;Tian and Roberts 2008). However, contradictory results showed up about how the inlet orientation influences the hydraulic efficiency (Shivaram 2007).…”
Section: Hydraulics Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The horizontal inlet orientation resulted in the best hydraulic efficiency. Previous studies considering mixing time have also observed the influence of inlet orientation on hydraulic efficiency (Maruyama et al 1982;Dakshinamoorthy et al 2006;Zughbi and Rakib 2004;Tian and Roberts 2008). However, contradictory results showed up about how the inlet orientation influences the hydraulic efficiency (Shivaram 2007).…”
Section: Hydraulics Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Maruyama et al (1984) as well as Zughbi (2006) found that the jet location had a major influence on jet mixing. Fox and Gex (1956) as well as Zughbi and Rakib (2004) reported that the jet angle and the jet length influence mixing time.…”
Section: Review On Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work related to horns used to increase mixing performance has emphasized nozzle placement related to a tank configuration [Ucar 1998, Yates and Akesson 1963, Zughbi and Rakib 2004, but not the nozzle design itself. Work reviewing nozzle design has emphasized diffusion at the maximum rate [Hilgers and Boersma 2001], with no consideration given to velocity at a distance from the jet.…”
Section: Nozzle Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yates and Akesson [1963] also review the placement and number of nozzles in a sprayer tank and the level of mixing they create. Zughbi and Rakib [2004] also use CFD simulations to predict mixing in a jet-agitated tank based on nozzle placement.…”
Section: Nozzle Designmentioning
confidence: 99%