Mixing layer height retrievals by multichannel microwave radiometer observations

Abstract

Abstract. The mixing layer height (MLH) is a key parameter for boundary layer studies, including meteorology, air quality, and climate. MLH estimates are inferred from in situ radiosonde measurements or remote sensing observations from instruments like lidar, wind profiling radar, or sodar. Methods used to estimate MLH from radiosonde profiles are also used with atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles retrieved by microwave radiometers (MWR). This paper proposes an alternative approach to estimate MLH from MWR data, based on direct observations (brightness temperatures, Tb) instead of retrieved profiles. To our knowledge, MLH estimates directly from Tb observations have never been attempted before. The method consists of a multivariate linear regression trained with an a priori set of collocated MWR Tb observations (multifrequency and multi-angle) and MLH estimates from a state-of-the-art lidar system. The proposed method was applied to a 7-month data set collected at a typical midlatitude site. Results show that the method is able to follow both the diurnal cycle and the day-to-day variability as suggested by the lidar measurements, and also it can detect low MLH values that are below the full overlap limit (∼ 200 m) of the lidar system used. Statistics of the comparison between MWR-and reference lidar-based MLH retrievals show mean difference within 10 m, root mean square within 340 m, and correlation coefficient higher than 0.77. Monthly mean analysis for daytime MLH from MWR, lidar, and radiosonde shows consistent seasonal variability, peaking at ∼ 1200-1400 m in June and decreasing down to ∼ 600 m in October. Conversely, nighttime monthly mean MLH from all methods are within 300-500 m without any significant seasonal variability. The proposed method provides results that are more consistent with radiosonde estimates than MLH estimates from MWR-retrieved profiles. MLH monthly mean values agree well within 1 standard deviation with the bulk Richardson number method applied at radiosonde profiles at 11:00 and 23:00 UTC. The method described herewith operates continuously and is expected to work with analogous performances for the entire diurnal cycle, except during considerable precipitation, demonstrating new potential for atmospheric observation by ground-based microwave radiometry.

A novel model evaluation approach focusing on local and advected contributions to urban PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels – application to Paris, France

“…Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 , particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter below 2.5 µm) pollution is well-known to produce adverse health effects (Chow et al, 2006), and to affect ecosystems and monuments through acidic deposition soiling (Likens et al, 1996;Lombardo et al, 2013). It also impacts on climate directly through its diffusing and absorptive properties and indirectly through various modifications of cloud properties (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005), leading to changes in the earth radiative balance (Forster et al, 2007).…”

Thermal Structure of a Coastal–Urban Boundary Layer

“…Microwave radiometers have the advantage of being robust instruments (Xu et al 2015), with a recent, extensive study judging them to be very good at estimating temperature profiles, particularly in the lower boundary layer (Lundquist et al 2017). While microwaveradiometer observations have been used to determine the mixed-layer height (Cimini et al 2013), the vertical extent of the urban heat island (Khaikine et al 2006), and for estimating stability conditions for wind-energy applications (Friedrich et al 2012), our main objectives here are to analyze the spatial variability in the thermal structure of the boundary layer over the highly dense area of New York City, and to quantify the diurnal and seasonal variabilities of the urban thermal and moisture profiles.…”

Ceilometer aerosol profiling versus Raman lidar in the frame of the INTERACT campaign of ACTRIS

“…Wiegner and Geiß, 2012) and are being trialed for aerosol mixing layer height measurement for air quality applications (e.g. Cimini et al, 2013). These instruments typically have signal to noise ratios (SNRs) considerably lower than lidar systems because of wider optical bandpass filters required to accommodate broader spectrum inexpensive diode laser sources.…”