1968
DOI: 10.2514/3.4443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing length and kinematic eddy viscosity in a compressible boundary layer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…is clearly less than one at large M and y= vw , so as to remove the slight increase of ' þ m with increasing M observed previously [9]. For a M ¼ 6, Re…”
Section: Prl 109 054502 (2012) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…is clearly less than one at large M and y= vw , so as to remove the slight increase of ' þ m with increasing M observed previously [9]. For a M ¼ 6, Re…”
Section: Prl 109 054502 (2012) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is not thoroughly studied [6], however. Over the past decades, a few experiments showed that ' þ m had an observable, although not strong, M effect, particularly in the outer part of the boundary layer [5,9]. Further evidence comes from direct numerical simulation (DNS) data [10], which show that the van Driest transformed MVP does not collapse well in the wake region, invalidating the M invariance of ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi " þ p @ " u þ =@y þ and thus the second assumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wellknown reference temperature methods (see, for instance, Rubesin and Johnson 16 or the Appendix to the paper by Coles 17 ) provide a very simple mapping of this type that might be useful in certain restricted applications. The second mapping has been more thoroughly evaluated and is based on a transformation originally developed by Van Driest 20 from mixing length arguments for the law of the wall region of the flow and subsequently found by Maise and McDonald,21 following an observation by Coles,22 to yield a surprisingly accurate collapse of a wide range of compressible adiabatic constant-pressure boundary-layer profiles, including the wake region of the boundary layer. Two techniques have emerged from these efforts, both of which seem to have been sufficiently successful to justify their consideration for use in calculation schemes.…”
Section: Integral Methods For Predicting the Blade Boundary Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two techniques have emerged from these efforts, both of which seem to have been sufficiently successful to justify their consideration for use in calculation schemes. Using the usual assumption that, in a transpired boundary layer, the local shear stress T is given by r = r w + puv w (6.9) the suggested form of the velocity profile for the compressible transpired boundary layer may be readily derived as "7 21 Fernholz and Finley object to the use of the conventionally defined boundary-layer thickness scale d as a profile scaling parameter to compare the measured data to the assumed profile because of the experimental difficulty of determining 8 with precision. Winter et al 18 show this to be true in the usual logarithmic region for their measurements at Mach 2.2, when they used the kinematic viscosity and density evaluated at the wall temperature in the usual law of the wall formulation for velocity.…”
Section: Integral Methods For Predicting the Blade Boundary Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%