2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-015-0690-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing rates for intermittent maps of high exponent

Abstract: We obtain higher order theory for the long term behavior of the transfer operator associated with the unit interval map f (x) = x(1+2 α x α ) if 0 < x < 1 2 , f (x) = 2x − 1 if 1 2 < x < 1 for the whole range α > 1, which corresponds to the infinite measure preserving case. Higher order theory for α ≥ 2 is more challenging and requires new techniques. Along the way, we provide higher order theory for scalar and operator renewal sequences with infinite measure and regular variation.Although the present work con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be more precise, when α ≥ 1, each intermittent map admits a unique (up to scaling) σ-finite (but not finite), absolutely continuous invariant measure µ. In these infinite measure settings, although one may still obtain certain mixing rate [0,1] f g • T n α dµ for some reasonably well-behaved observables f, g. (See e.g., [16,22] for the concrete statements), there is no analogous result as in (9) to the best of our knowledge. Secondly, the classical Borel-Cantelli lemma does not hold in the infinite measure setting.…”
Section: Discussion For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more precise, when α ≥ 1, each intermittent map admits a unique (up to scaling) σ-finite (but not finite), absolutely continuous invariant measure µ. In these infinite measure settings, although one may still obtain certain mixing rate [0,1] f g • T n α dµ for some reasonably well-behaved observables f, g. (See e.g., [16,22] for the concrete statements), there is no analogous result as in (9) to the best of our knowledge. Secondly, the classical Borel-Cantelli lemma does not hold in the infinite measure setting.…”
Section: Discussion For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results on mixing when β ∈ ( 1 2 , 1] for semiflows (Corollary 3.1 and the extensions in Section 9) and for flows (Theorem 10.5), are proved by adapting Erickson's methods to the deterministic setting.For β ≤ 1 2 , additional hypotheses are needed on the tail of τ to obtain a strong renewal theorem (and hence mixing) even for discrete time; see [15,19,22] for i.i.d. results and [24] for deterministic results (see also [41] for higher order theory in both the i.i.d. and deterministic settings).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…See [27,36] and also [22,33,34] for improved asymptotics. (c) One obtains a limit theorem (stable law) via the spectral method, the Nagaev-Guivarc'h (also referred to as Aaronson-Denker) method, for f τ ; we refer to the comprehensive survey [20] and to the original papers [2,21].…”
Section: Methods Of Proof and The Main Dynamical Ingredientmentioning
confidence: 99%