2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing tree species associated with arbuscular or ectotrophic mycorrhizae reveals dual mycorrhization and interactive effects on the fungal partners

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(135 reference statements)
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast with earlier work in grassland [10] and on fungal communities in the BEF-China experiment [26]. Unlike these earlier studies, we have collected soil samples underneath individual trees rather than at the community-level, and it is therefore reasonable to suggest that the decline in soil bacterial diversity may point to a ‘dilution effect’ [23, 76]. From this perspective, the tree species richness gradient from 1, 2 to 4 resulted in smaller densities of conspecific tree species in the focal tree species, so that some focal tree-specific bacteria may be restricted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This is in contrast with earlier work in grassland [10] and on fungal communities in the BEF-China experiment [26]. Unlike these earlier studies, we have collected soil samples underneath individual trees rather than at the community-level, and it is therefore reasonable to suggest that the decline in soil bacterial diversity may point to a ‘dilution effect’ [23, 76]. From this perspective, the tree species richness gradient from 1, 2 to 4 resulted in smaller densities of conspecific tree species in the focal tree species, so that some focal tree-specific bacteria may be restricted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…2). This exclusive directionality of host expansion, EMF on AMF-host, can be explained by the saprotrophic status of EMF versus the obligate biotrophic characteristic of AMF (Heklau et al 2021). While our specific species of…”
Section: Mutualism Host Expansion In the Mixed Forestmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2 ). This exclusive directionality of host expansion, EMF on AMF-host, can be explained by the saprotrophic status of EMF versus the obligate biotrophic characteristic of AMF (Heklau et al 2021). While our specific species of Cupressus and Pistacia were not yet confirmed as dual- mycorrhizal plants (i.e., AM arbuscules or coils and EM structures such as Hartig net are both observed on roots of the same plant), other species from the same genera are known for their ability to host both AM and EM fungi (Teste et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BiodiversiTREE; BEF-China; Macomer, van de Peer et al ., 2018; and MyDiv, Ferlian et al ., 2018) allows testing mycorrhiza type effects, but these experiments use EcM trees belonging to a maximum three EcM plant lineages. In the MyDiv experiment, all tree species have been reported as dual mycorrhizal, where EcM colonisation of the predicted AM plants often exceeds that of predicted EcM plants (Heklau et al ., 2021), challenging the mycorrhiza type comparisons (if true). Furthermore, these experiments do not use root exclusion mechanisms, which may strongly blur measurements of soil biodiversity and function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%