MLE Strategies as Determinants of Executive Functions

Tzuriel, David

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_18

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 121 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If one's objective is to understand the strategies involved in an important learning task, from a clinical perspective, a molecular level heuristic model is a better choice, i.e., general selfregulation (SR) (Liew, 2011;Miller et al, 2011;Ahmed et al, 2019). If one desires to understand difficulty, including the role of context, it seems more useful to adopt a molar level of analysis (SR vs. ER) (Doebel, 2020;Tzuriel, 2021). For all the above reasons, it is essential that we assign models to their proper scope and their object of study, understanding their strengths and limitations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Executive Functions, Self-Regulation and External-Regulation: Relations and new evidence

de la Fuente,

J. Fuentes,

H. Santos

et al. 2023

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Frontiers is more than just an open access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone is not enough to realize our grand goals. Frontiers journal seriesThe Frontiers journal series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of openaccess, online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly community. At the same time, the Frontiers journal series operates on a revolutionary invention, the tiered publishing system, initially addressing specific communities of scholars, and gradually climbing up to broader public understanding, thus serving the interests of the lay society, too. Dedication to qualityEach Frontiers article is a landmark of the highest quality, thanks to genuinely collaborative interactions between authors and review editors, who include some of the world's best academicians. Research must be certified by peers before entering a stream of knowledge that may eventually reach the public -and shape society; therefore, Frontiers only applies the most rigorous and unbiased reviews. Frontiers revolutionizes research publishing by freely delivering the most outstanding research, evaluated with no bias from both the academic and social point of view. By applying the most advanced information technologies, Frontiers is catapulting scholarly publishing into a new generation. What are Frontiers Research Topics?Frontiers Research Topics are very popular trademarks of the Frontiers journals series: they are collections of at least ten articles, all centered on a particular subject. With their unique mix of varied contributions from Original Research to Review Articles, Frontiers Research Topics unify the most influential researchers, the latest key findings and historical advances in a hot research area.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Executive Functions, Self-Regulation and External-Regulation: Relations and new evidence

de la Fuente,

J. Fuentes,

H. Santos

et al. 2023

Frontiers Research Topics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…If one’s objective is to understand the strategies involved in an important learning task, from a clinical perspective, a molecular level heuristic model is a better choice, i.e., general self-regulation (SR) ( Liew, 2011 ; Miller et al, 2011 ; Ahmed et al, 2019 ). If one desires to understand difficulty, including the role of context, it seems more useful to adopt a molar level of analysis (SR vs. ER) ( Doebel, 2020 ; Tzuriel, 2021 ). For all the above reasons, it is essential that we assign models to their proper scope and their object of study, understanding their strengths and limitations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differential Predictive Effect of Self-Regulation Behavior and the Combination of Self- vs. External Regulation Behavior on Executive Dysfunctions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties, in University Students

Fuente

Vicente²,

Pachón-Basallo³

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to establish linear relations (association and prediction) and inferential relations between three constructs at different levels of psychological research –executive dysfunction(microanalysis),self-regulation(molecular level), andself-vs.external regulation(molar level), in the prediction of emotion regulation difficulties. We hypothesized that personal and contextual regulatory factors would be negatively related to levels of executive dysfunction and emotion regulation difficulties; by way of complement, non-regulatory and dysregulatory personal, and contextual factors would be positively related to these same difficulties. To establish relationships, we used a retrospective,ex postfacto design, where 298 university students voluntarily participated by completing standardized self-reports. Linear and structural correlational, predictive analyses were performed, as well as inferential analyses. Results were consistent and validated the proposed hypotheses, for both association and prediction. The most important result refers to the discriminant value of the five-level combination heuristic for predicting Executive Function and External (contextual) Dys-Regulation. In conclusion: (1) both personal and contextual regulation factors must be analyzed in order to better understand the variation in executive functions and emotion regulation difficulties; (2) it is important to continue connecting the different levels of the constructs referring to self-regulation, given their complementary role in the behavioral analysis of regulation difficulties.

show abstract

MLE Strategies as Determinants of Executive Functions

Cited by 2 publications

References 121 publications

Executive Functions, Self-Regulation and External-Regulation: Relations and new evidence

Executive Functions, Self-Regulation and External-Regulation: Relations and new evidence

Differential Predictive Effect of Self-Regulation Behavior and the Combination of Self- vs. External Regulation Behavior on Executive Dysfunctions and Emotion Regulation Difficulties, in University Students

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About