1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018903104476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for j = 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2 are listed in Table 4 for α = 0 and in Table 5 for α = 5. Comparing the results for the bound (34) and (35) to these for the bound (8)- (13) given in Tables 2 and 3, it is seen that the two bounds are of the same size of the domain of validity. The bound ( 8)-( 13) from Theorem 1 is superior to the bound (34) and (35) from Theorem 2 with respect of closeness to the estimated quantity.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained for j = 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2 are listed in Table 4 for α = 0 and in Table 5 for α = 5. Comparing the results for the bound (34) and (35) to these for the bound (8)- (13) given in Tables 2 and 3, it is seen that the two bounds are of the same size of the domain of validity. The bound ( 8)-( 13) from Theorem 1 is superior to the bound (34) and (35) from Theorem 2 with respect of closeness to the estimated quantity.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To estimate the sensitivity of the problem (24), we consider the strategies proposed in [13]. We represent the calculated perturbed solution to (24) with collection of data coefficients Z m = T A m , T D m , S m , F m , G m , Y 0 ) as the exact solution to a slightly perturbed problem with collection of data coefficients Z m + ∆Z m .…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Low-dimensional Approximate Solutions To Larg...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation