2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMDIT: A tool for the deconvolution and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The historic limitation of traditional mtDNA typing has been a lower discrimination potential created by a combination of uniparental inheritance of the mitochondrial (mito) genome and limited resolution of mixtures associated with Sanger sequencing. The increased sensitivity currently achievable with massively parallel sequencing (MPS) enables accurate characterization and reporting of intrinsic, low-level sequence mitogenome variants [3][4][5][6][7], and an advantage of uniparental inheritance is an expectation that the majority of individuals will only contribute one haplotype to a mixed sample making mtDNA an attractive aid in the assessment of mixed DNA samples [2,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The historic limitation of traditional mtDNA typing has been a lower discrimination potential created by a combination of uniparental inheritance of the mitochondrial (mito) genome and limited resolution of mixtures associated with Sanger sequencing. The increased sensitivity currently achievable with massively parallel sequencing (MPS) enables accurate characterization and reporting of intrinsic, low-level sequence mitogenome variants [3][4][5][6][7], and an advantage of uniparental inheritance is an expectation that the majority of individuals will only contribute one haplotype to a mixed sample making mtDNA an attractive aid in the assessment of mixed DNA samples [2,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An overview by Coble and Bright [17], focusing on autosomal mixture interpretation using probabilistic approaches noted, "there is a strong need to apply probabilistic methods to interpreting mixtures with haploid marker systems", such as mtDNA. To date, little work has been done to deconvolute mixtures of mtDNA sequence from MPS data [2,8,18,19]. The availability of MPS mtDNA data presents an opportunity to shift this paradigm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study we developed and evaluated a strategy to deconvolute mtDNA mixtures using phylogenetic principles. Earlier attempts to separate human mtDNA mixtures applied physical methods, such as denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography [6] , [18] , base composition profiling using mass spectrometry [12] , quantitative data in a statistical framework [9] and MPS-based data [5] , [13] , [21] with a continuous statistical phasing framework [28] . While some of these strategies have proven useful, there is still a lack of technology-agnostic, non-quantitative and easy to use mtDNA mixture deconvolution tools that provide traceable splittings on any kind of sequencing data (Sanger and MPS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%