1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.35.2067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cr52(p,n)52

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are directly linked to the calculation of cross sections and thick target yields by means of the activation formula. Additionally the maxima of the excitation functions are not well described in those publications [23,25]. Concerning the production of 51 Mn comprehensive data have been reported by Klein et al [7]" including additional cross section data for 52g,m Mn and the important radioactive by-products 48 V, 48 Cr and 51 Cr.…”
Section: Present Literature and New Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are directly linked to the calculation of cross sections and thick target yields by means of the activation formula. Additionally the maxima of the excitation functions are not well described in those publications [23,25]. Concerning the production of 51 Mn comprehensive data have been reported by Klein et al [7]" including additional cross section data for 52g,m Mn and the important radioactive by-products 48 V, 48 Cr and 51 Cr.…”
Section: Present Literature and New Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They are also shown in Figs. 2-7 as a function of the proton energy, together with the corresponding literature data [7,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For direct comparison the literature cross section data measured on enriched target materials given in the figures were converted to the natural abundance of the respective chromium isotope (see Table 3).…”
Section: Present Literature and New Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen relative errors are 6, 7, 8 and 12% for the above mentioned monitor reactions, respectively. In proton irradiations, the monitor reactions nat Cu(p,x) 62 Zn [24,25], nat Cu(p,x) 63 Zn [25,26], 27 52 Mn [19] were used (cf. [29]).…”
Section: Monitor Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of manganese, several radioisotopes are suited because of reasonable half-lives. Production routes have been reported for 56 Mn (2.58 h) [1], 54 Mn (312.2 d) [2,3], 52 Mn (5.6 d) [4,5], 52m Mn (21.1 min) via parent 52 Fe [6], and 51 Mn (46.2 min) [3]. In fact, radiotracers have already been used for labelling contrast agents [7][8][9][10], but due to the limiting physical properties of the nuclides used (long half-life, β − -decay etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the case of Gd-compounds the SPECT nuclide 147 Gd (t 1/2 = 38.1 h, E γ = 229 keV (61%)) has been shown to be suitable [11], manganese offers two PET nuclides, namely 52m Mn (t 1/2 = 21.1 min, I β + = 97%, E β + (max) = 0.6 MeV, IT = 1.75%) and 51 Mn (t 1/2 = 46.2 min, I β + = 97%, E β + (max) = 2.5 MeV). 52m Mn of high radionuclidic purity is only available from the 52 Fe/ 52m Mn generator [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], since direct nuclear reactions, such as the 52 Cr( p, 2n) process, always lead to an isomeric mixture [3,4]. The almost pure positron emitter 51 Mn in comparison has a suitable half-life and can be produced at a small cyclotron in high radionuclidic purity using the 50 Cr(d, n) reaction [3,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%