2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.72.155109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GW+Ttheory of excited electron lifetimes in metals

Abstract: We develop a first-principle GW+ T approach to calculate excited electron lifetimes in metals that includes evaluation of the lowest self-energy term of the many-body perturbation theory in GW approximation and higher terms in the T-matrix approximation. The method is applied to studies of the electron lifetimes in Pd, Ta, and Al. We find that the T-matrix contribution to the lifetime is more important in Al than in Ta and Pd and relate this to the static screened potential. The inclusion of the T-matrix great… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism we propose for enhancement of the magnetization is based on filling of majority spin states above the Fermi energy in the Fe layer by majority spins coming from Ni. This leads to a transient magnetization increase in the Fe layer, above its maximum value defined by the Curie curve at T = 0 K. The increase in the magnetic signal from the Fe layer is a result of a strong asymmetry in the spin-dependent hot-electron lifetimes in magnetic materials and, hence, the transport properties of the hot majority and minority spin carriers [27][28][29] within the Ni and Fe layers. Excited minority spin electrons originating in the optical excitation in both the Al and Ni layers have much shorter lifetimes when passing via superdiffusion through the Ni layer, and are therefore stopped before they can reach the Fe layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanism we propose for enhancement of the magnetization is based on filling of majority spin states above the Fermi energy in the Fe layer by majority spins coming from Ni. This leads to a transient magnetization increase in the Fe layer, above its maximum value defined by the Curie curve at T = 0 K. The increase in the magnetic signal from the Fe layer is a result of a strong asymmetry in the spin-dependent hot-electron lifetimes in magnetic materials and, hence, the transport properties of the hot majority and minority spin carriers [27][28][29] within the Ni and Fe layers. Excited minority spin electrons originating in the optical excitation in both the Al and Ni layers have much shorter lifetimes when passing via superdiffusion through the Ni layer, and are therefore stopped before they can reach the Fe layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The z coordinate is defined as being normal to the layers. The spin-and excitation energy-dependent electronic lifetimes and velocities 27,29 , as well as the ratio of excited majority to minority spin electrons 35 , are taken from ab initio calculations. The femtosecond spin dynamics follows from m(E, z, t) = 2µ B [n(↑, E, z, t) − n(↓, E, z, t)], with m(E, z, t) the transient spin moment of excited electrons along the depth profile.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, it is well known that the response function in the T -matrix approximation leads to reasonable results for the magnetic response function [43,44].¯ T has been used in various studies to account for magnetic fluctuations in non-SC systems [46][47][48][49].…”
Section: A Inclusion Of the Relevant Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, Ref. [15] does not provide inelastic lifetimes for excited electrons with low energies (i.e., from the Fermi level to 0.5 eV above). We made a linear extrapolation to estimate lifetimes for the lowest energies; the influence of this approximation is discussed further below, together with those of other approximations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2], the ratio of excited spin-up to spin-down electrons from [14], and the spin-dependent inelastic lifetimes and velocities from Ref. [15]. Unfortunately, Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%