1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.176.1227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Li6(p, p)

Abstract: The total cross section for the 6 Li(^,^') 6 Li(3.56 MeV) reaction was measured by observing the isotropic 3.56-MeV de-excitation y rays in a 20-cm 3 Ge(Li) detector and was found to decrease slowly with energy. In a microscopic model of the reaction, this cross section depends only on the spin-isospin-dependent part Fn of the effective interaction. At energies above 34 MeV, the data are well described by a potential, Vn= Ve-ar /ar, where the range 1/a is taken to be 1.0 F, and F= 12.1 MeV. At 25 MeV, F= 11.1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1972
1972

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical potential, below which moment formation does not occur, is ITL\/A . 5 S = i expected for the singly occupied localized s state treated in this model. In addition, the density of states, while closer to that expected for U» A than the density of states of the nonparquet equations, still has much too strong a background in the region between the two peaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical potential, below which moment formation does not occur, is ITL\/A . 5 S = i expected for the singly occupied localized s state treated in this model. In addition, the density of states, while closer to that expected for U» A than the density of states of the nonparquet equations, still has much too strong a background in the region between the two peaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…2(b)]. The cross-hatched area represents an estimate of the ratio at 20 MeV obtained by extrapolating the 7 n l cross sections measured at higher energies (23 ^E p ^ 53 MeV) by Locard et al 5 The K is required because our neglect of optical parameters is no longer justified in this case since in addition to the large difference in Q value we have different isospins in the initial and final states and hence quite possibly different optical parameters. There is another difficulty in that (a) 2 was obtained from the 6 He -* 6 Li beta decay, but 6 Be is unstable against particle emission and hence the overlap of the wave functions will not be as large as estimated from beta decay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%