2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.014003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

γ*NN*(1520) form factors in the timelike regime

Abstract: The covariant spectator quark model, tested before in a variety of electromagnetic baryon excitations, is applied here to the γ * N → N * (1520) reaction in the timelike regime. The transition form factors are first parametrized in the spacelike region in terms of a valence quark core model together with a parametrization of the meson cloud contribution. The form factor behavior in the timelike region is then predicted, as well as the N * (1520) → γN decay width and the N * (1520) Dalitz decay, N * (1520) → e … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functions G i (i = 1, .., 4) are form factor functions that depend on Q 2 , but only three of them are independent. From current conservation [9,28] we conclude thatAnother useful combination of the form factorsUsing the previous form factors we can express the γ * N → N (1520) helicity amplitudes defined by Eqs. (3.3)-(3.5) as [1, 9]…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The functions G i (i = 1, .., 4) are form factor functions that depend on Q 2 , but only three of them are independent. From current conservation [9,28] we conclude thatAnother useful combination of the form factorsUsing the previous form factors we can express the γ * N → N (1520) helicity amplitudes defined by Eqs. (3.3)-(3.5) as [1, 9]…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In a relativistic framework the imposition of the orthogonality condition is more complex, since the nucleon and the resonance R cannot be at rest in the same frame, and the boost changes the properties of the states. As a consequence, states that are orthogonal when the mass difference can be neglected may not be orthogonal when the mass difference is taken into account.The problem of how to define a wave function of a nucleon excitation that generalizes the nonrelativistic structure of the state and is also orthogonal to the nucleon was already discussed in the context of the covariant spectator quark model for the negative parity resonances 1 The nonrelativistic limit can also be defined as the equal mass limit (M R = M N ) or as the heavy baryon limit, when the terms 1520) and N (1535) [8][9][10]. The solution at the time was to define the radial wave functions for the N * states in order to ensure the orthogonality with the nucleon state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations