2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.84.1398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GEp/GMp

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
523
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 729 publications
(549 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
21
523
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[79] for definitions.). In the model of Frank, Jennings and Miller [81,82], the strong decrease of G p E /G p M with Q 2 emerges as an important consequence of the spin-dependent relativistic effects on the light-front quark wavefunctions embodied by the Melosh rotation (2.13) which is qualitatively confirmed by the recoil polarization data [32,31,33]. This model tends to predict a somewhat faster Despite the relative phenomenological success of nucleon models based entirely on constituent quarks, the shortcomings of these models are well known.…”
Section: Constituent Quark Modelssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[79] for definitions.). In the model of Frank, Jennings and Miller [81,82], the strong decrease of G p E /G p M with Q 2 emerges as an important consequence of the spin-dependent relativistic effects on the light-front quark wavefunctions embodied by the Melosh rotation (2.13) which is qualitatively confirmed by the recoil polarization data [32,31,33]. This model tends to predict a somewhat faster Despite the relative phenomenological success of nucleon models based entirely on constituent quarks, the shortcomings of these models are well known.…”
Section: Constituent Quark Modelssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In 1973, a VMD-based model by Iachello et al [66] was among the earliest to predict a decrease of the proton G E /G M ratio for Q 2 ≥ 1 GeV 2 , which was in rough agreement with the not-yet-available recoil polarization data from Jefferson Lab [32,33,31]. In this model, as few as three adjustable parameters were used to fit the form factor data available at the time.…”
Section: Dispersion Relations and Vector Meson Dominancesupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally they have been extracted under the assumption of one-photon exchange via the Rosenbluth cross section in (4.40). It came as quite a surprise when the polarisation transfer measurements at Jefferson Lab revealed a ratio G p E /G p M that falls off and points towards a zero crossing at larger Q 2 [568][569][570][571], in stark contrast to the Rosenbluth measurements which had predicted a constant ratio. The question of the zero crossing for G p E is not yet settled because the experimental errors are still too large, but the situation is expected to change in the near future with the Jefferson Lab 12 GeV program where measurements in Halls A, B and C will extend the data range for G p E , G n E , and G n M up to the 10 -14 GeV 2 region [572].…”
Section: Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this respect, new experiments with polarised beams and/or polarised targets performed at Jefferson Lab allowed to extract the ratio G E /G M directly. However, the resulting ratio disagrees with the scaling predictions and shows a falloff with t, even pointing towards a zero crossing at larger t [568][569][570][571].…”
Section: Overview Of Two-photon Physicsmentioning
confidence: 85%