<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mn /><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn /></mml:math>two- and three-body hadronic decays

Bai, J. Z.; Ban, Y.; Bian, J. G.; Blum, I.; Cai, X.; Chang, J. F.; Chen, H. F.; Chen, H. S.; Chen, J.; Chen, Jie; Chen, J. C.; Chen, Y. B.; P., S.; Chu, Y. P.; Cui, X. Z.; Dai, Y. S.; Liu, Dong; Du, Z. Z.; Dunwoodie, W.; Fang, J.; Fang, S. S.; Fu, Hai-Bing; Fu, L. P.; Gao, C. S.; Gao, Yang; Gong, Ming; Gratton, P.; Gu, S.; Guo, Y. N.; Guo, Y. Q.; Guo, Z. J.; Han, S. W.; Harris, F. A.; He, J.; He, K. L.; He, Miao; He, X. Q.; Heng, Y. K.; Hong, T. M.; Hitlin, D. G.; Hu, H. M.; Hu, T.; Huang, G. S.; Huang, X. P.; Izen, J. M.; Ji, X. B.; Jiang, C. H.; Jiang, X. S.; Jin, D. P.; Jin, S.; Jin, Y.; Jones, B. D.; Ke, Z. J.; Kelsey, M. H.; Kim, B. K.; Kong, D.; Lai, Y. F.; G., Li,; Li, H. H.; Li, J.; Li, J. C.; Li, Q. J.; Li, R. Y.; Li, W.; G., Li, W.; Li, X. Q.; Liu, C. F.; Liu, F.; Liu, Feng; Liu, H. M.; Liu, J. P.; Liu, R. G.; Liu, T. R.; Liu, Y.; A., Liu, Z.; Liu, Z. X.; Lou, X. C.; Lowery, B.; Lu, G. R.; Lu, F. X.; Lü, H. J.; Lu, J. G.; Lu, Z. J.; Luo, X. L.; C., E.; C., F.; M., J.; Malchow, R.; Mao, Z. P.; Meng, X. C.; Mo, X. H.; Nie, J.; Nie, Z. D.; Olsen, S. L.; Oyang, J.; Paluselli, D.; Lu, Pan; Panetta, J.; Peng, H.; Porter, F. C.; Qi, N. D.; Qian, C. D.; Qiu, J. F.; Rong, G.; Schernau, M.; Shen, D. L.; Shen, Hong; Shen, X. Y.; Sheng, H. Y.; Shi, Feng; Standifird, J.; Sun, H.; Sun, S.; Sun, Y. Z.; Tang, X.; Tian, Dongxu; Toki, W. H.; Tong, G. L.; Varner, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, L. S.; Wang, M.; Wang, Meng; Wang, P.; Wang, P. L.; Wang, W. F.; Wang, Y. F.; Wang, Y. Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Zheng; Wang, Z. Y.; Weaver, M.; Wei, C.; Wu, N.; Xia, X. M.; Xie, X. X.; Xu, G. F.; Xu, Yuan-Guo; Xue, S.; Yan, Mu-Lin; Yan, W. B.; Yang, C. Y.; Yang, G.; Yang, H. X.; Yang, W. C.; H., Ye, M.; Ye, Shoujie; Ye, Y. X.; Ying, J.; Chen, Yu; Yu, G.; Yuan, C. Z.; Yuan, J. M.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, B. X.; Zhang, B. Y.; Zhang, C. C.; Zhang, D. H.; Zhang, H. Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L. S.; Zhang, Q. J.; Zhang, S. Q.; Zhang, X. Y.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Zhang, Yiyun; Zhang, Z. P.; Zhao, Dongxu; Zhao, J. B.; Zhao, Jiawei; Zhao, P. P.; Zhao, W. R.; Zhao, Y. B.; Zhao, Z. G.; Zheng, J. P.; Zheng, Lei; Zheng, Z. P.; Zhong, X. C.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, G. M.; Li, Zhou; Zhu, K. J.; Zhu, Q. M.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Y. S.; Zhu, Z. A.; Zhuang, B. A.; Zou, B. S.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.052002

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For the decay of ψð3686Þ → ppϕ, BES reported an upper limit on the branching fraction Bðψð3686Þ → ppϕÞ of 2.6 × 10 −5 at the 90% confidence level (C.L.) [15]. The latest measurement came from CLEO [16], who reported an upper limit on the branching fraction Bðψð3686Þ → ppϕÞ of 2.4 × 10 −5 at the 90% C.L.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Observation of ψ(3686)→pp¯ϕ

Ablikim¹,

Ачасов²,

Adlarson³

et al. 2019

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using a data sample of 4.48 × 10 8 ψð3686Þ events collected with the BESIII detector, we present a first observation of ψð3686Þ → ppϕ, and we measure its branching fraction to be ½6.06 AE 0.38ðstatÞAE 0.48ðsystÞ × 10 −6. In contrast to the earlier discovery of a threshold enhancement in the pp-mass spectrum of the channel J=ψ → γpp, denoted as XðppÞ, we do not find a similar enhancement in ψð3686Þ → ppϕ. An upper limit of 1.82 × 10 −7 at the 90% confidence level on the branching fraction of ψð3686Þ → XðppÞϕ → ppϕ is obtained.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Observation of ψ(3686)→pp¯ϕ

Ablikim¹,

Ачасов²,

Adlarson³

et al. 2019

Phys. Rev. D

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

ψ″ Decays to charmless final states

Rosner

2005

Annals of Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of measuring the non-DD decays of the ψ ′′ = ψ(3770) resonance is discussed. These decays can shed light on a possible discrepancy between the total and DD cross sections at the ψ ′′ , and on a proposed mechanism for enhancement of penguin amplitudes in B meson decays through charm-anticharm annihilation. Measurements (including the ψ ′′ line shape) in states of definite G-parity and in inclusive charmless final states such as η ′ + X are found to be particularly important.

show abstract

New results From CLEO and BES

Seth

2005

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ψ(2S)two- and three-body hadronic decays

Cited by 17 publications

References 17 publications

Observation of ψ(3686)→pp¯ϕ

Observation of ψ(3686)→pp¯ϕ

ψ″ Decays to charmless final states

New results From CLEO and BES

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About