1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.30.1256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K+-nucleus elastic scattering and charge exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show qualitative agreement with previous work [6]. Modifications to the kaonnucleon amplitudes in the nuclear medium are needed to eliminate discrepancies between the theory and the data.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Future Prospectssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results show qualitative agreement with previous work [6]. Modifications to the kaonnucleon amplitudes in the nuclear medium are needed to eliminate discrepancies between the theory and the data.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Future Prospectssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…[6]. Our eikonal model, which is also a coordinate space approach and been shown to be a good approximation to the "model-exact" momentum space theory for high-energy pion scattering, can also be modified to treat the kaon scattering.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These reaction and total cross sections provide 32 data points for the study of medium effects in K + nuclear interactions. It had been realized for the total cross sections data subset [12][13][14][15][16], and quite recently also for the reaction cross sections data subset [7,19], that the values of these integral cross sections, for the relatively dense C, Si and Ca nuclei, exceed substantially the predictions of the first-order optical potential V opt = tρ, by up to about 25%. This is inconceivable [13] for as weakly interacting hadron as the K meson is.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected then [1] that K-nuclear interactions be well described, in terms of the free-space KN t matrix and the nuclear density ρ, by the first-order optical potential V opt = tρ. However, K + nucleus total cross section values [2][3][4][5][6][7] and reaction cross section values [7] derived from attenuation cross sections measured in transmission experiments, as well as elastic [8,9] and inelastic differential cross sections [8,10] and quasifree spectra [11], all point to a substantial departure of the order of 10-20% from the predictions of a simple tρ potential, even when many conventional nuclear medium effects are incorporated [12,13]. Several nonconventional medium effects have also been proposed to remedy the failure of the first-order optical potential approach, such as nucleon swelling [14], or density dependent vector meson masses [15], or polarizing the nuclear medium byNN excitations [16], or meson exchange currents [17,18], but as we shall discuss in the concluding section, none of these models provides a satisfactory solution to the discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%