1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.24.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ca40(d,He3

Abstract: The differential cross sections of the 'He groups emitted in the "Ca(d, 'He)"K reaction have been measured at a bombarding energy of 76 MeV. The 'He particles were measured with an energy resolution of 55 keV. Differential cross sections were fitted using a distorted wave program and spectroscopic factors were deduced for several proton hole states of "K. The single hole final states essentially exhaust the sum rule for the 1d 3/2 2s 1/2 and 1d ", subshells.Because of the strong absorption of 'He particles in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their experiment produces similar yields for the reaction 40 Ca(γ, nγ ) 39 Ca, and the distinction between theses reactions is based on energy alone; however, as the resolution of the γ rays is 50 keV or more because of the Doppler broadening as well as the small Ge(Li) detector, the identification of a γ ray is not always unique. Nonetheness, as noted by Igo-Kemenes et al, the comparison between muon capture and the 40 Ca(γ, pγ ) 39 K reaction [5] shows great similarity, whereas the spectroscopic factors [8,10] are not a good predictor of what we observe 045501-6 TABLE IX. Yields for muon capture to specific levels in 40 K with the cascading effects removed, compared to the earlier results of Igo-Kemenes et al [3], all given as yield per capture.…”
Section: Muon Capture Results For 40 Casupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their experiment produces similar yields for the reaction 40 Ca(γ, nγ ) 39 Ca, and the distinction between theses reactions is based on energy alone; however, as the resolution of the γ rays is 50 keV or more because of the Doppler broadening as well as the small Ge(Li) detector, the identification of a γ ray is not always unique. Nonetheness, as noted by Igo-Kemenes et al, the comparison between muon capture and the 40 Ca(γ, pγ ) 39 K reaction [5] shows great similarity, whereas the spectroscopic factors [8,10] are not a good predictor of what we observe 045501-6 TABLE IX. Yields for muon capture to specific levels in 40 K with the cascading effects removed, compared to the earlier results of Igo-Kemenes et al [3], all given as yield per capture.…”
Section: Muon Capture Results For 40 Casupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For the (µ − , νn) reaction we compare with a photonuclear experiment by Ullrich and Krauth [5], which was also available to Igo-Kemenes et al [3]. More recent spectroscopic factors are available from the (d, 3 He) reaction [6][7][8] and have been evaluated by Singh and Cameron (see Refs. [9,10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fragment energies E i and spectroscopic factors S i were taken from Refs. [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] and [18]. The corresponding experimental spin-orbit splittings of 40 Ca are plotted on Fig.…”
Section: A Ca Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, two-step processes may occur in spite of the high incident energy [2]. Spectroscopic factors that small should be considered cautiously.…”
Section: Fig1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far most calculations assumed a perfect proton shell closure largely based upon the results of a previous 48Ca(d,3He) experiment at 52 MeV [i] in which no evidence for ~(f,p)2(s,d)-2 configurations in the ground state of 48Ca was found, in contrast to the situation in 4~ [1,2]. We report on first direct observation of a deviation from proton shell closure in the ground state of 48Ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%