2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.075005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

( g2 ) anomalies and neutrino mass

Abstract: Motivated by the experimentally observed deviations from standard model predictions, we calculate the anomalous magnetic moments a α ¼ ðg − 2Þ α for α ¼ e, μ in a neutrino mass model originally proposed by Babu, Nandi, and Tavartkiladze (BNT). We discuss two variants of the model: the original model, and a minimally extended version with an additional hypercharge-zero triplet scalar. While the original BNT model can explain a μ , only the variant with the triplet scalar can explain both experimental anomalies.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various attempts for simultaneous explanation of the leptonic anomalous magnetic moment anomalies have been made in the past several years [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Models with axionlike particles (ALP) [16], lepto-quarks [27,[30][31][32], vector-like leptons (VLL) [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and super-symmetric models [28,29,[40][41][42] have been employed with varying success to explain the anomaly.…”
Section: Jhep11(2021)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various attempts for simultaneous explanation of the leptonic anomalous magnetic moment anomalies have been made in the past several years [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Models with axionlike particles (ALP) [16], lepto-quarks [27,[30][31][32], vector-like leptons (VLL) [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and super-symmetric models [28,29,[40][41][42] have been employed with varying success to explain the anomaly.…”
Section: Jhep11(2021)056mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New models have been constructed to accommodate both a Cs e and a µ . Moreover, [31][32][33] also attempt to incorporate the neutrino mass generation with the observed a e,µ . However, the most recent α determination by using the rubidium atom [34] whose sign is different from the one of a Cs e .…”
Section: Jhep09(2021)043mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, here the measured value is lower than the corresponding SM prediction. Following the improved estimates, specially in the evaluation of a e , attempts have been made to link the both discrepancies with a common new physics origin [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85].…”
Section: Bounds Related To Different Experiments and Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%