2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.054025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BandBsmeson spectroscopy

Abstract: Properties of bottom and bottom-strange mesons are computed in two relativized quark models. Model masses and wavefunctions are used to predict radiative transition rates and the 3 P0 quark pair creation model is used to compute strong decay widths. A comparison to recently observed bottom and bottom-strange states is made. We find that there are numerous excited B and Bs mesons that have relatively narrow widths and significant branching ratios to simple final states such as Bπ, B * π, BK, and B * K that coul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

35
146
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
35
146
8
Order By: Relevance
“…and is in agreement with expectations from quark model calculations which predict a value of 0.058 for this ratio [10].…”
Section: Inclusive Studiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…and is in agreement with expectations from quark model calculations which predict a value of 0.058 for this ratio [10].…”
Section: Inclusive Studiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The mass and width of the D * 1 (2680) state are close to those of the D * (2600) observed by the BaBar collaboration [3] and the D * J (2650) observed by the LHCb collaboration [4]. The D * 1 (2680), D * (2600) and D * J (2650) may be the same particle, and can assigned to be the 2S 1 − state [5,6,7,8,9], see Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The D * 3 (2760) 0 , D * (2760) 0 , D * J (2760) 0 may be the same particle, and can be assigned to be the 1D 3 − state [5,6,7,8,9,11]. It is reasonable to assign the D * 3 (2760) to be the non-strange partner of the D * s3 (2860) according to the mass gap [5,6,7,8,9,11,12], see Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest results [4,5,10,11] from the LHCb collaboration have revealed two different states with J P = 1 − and 3 − in the same mass region ∼ 2800 MeV for D J and ∼ 2860 MeV for D sJ states. Theoretically, to classify these states on the basis of quark model, their decay properties have been extensively studied [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and remains a hotly debated issue. In the quark model classification, a J P = 3 − state in this mass region has no other choice than to be assigned to a 1 3 D 3 state, and a J P = 1 − state that has mass very close to the J P = 3 − states, is likely to be assigned to the same multiplet 1 3 D 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%