1975
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.11.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kx-ray production in single collisions of chlorine and sulfur ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculations are normalized such that S a = 1.0 for 20 Ne(d, 6 Li) 16 O at E d = 35 MeV.^9 As anticipated, the S a values show the same odd-even variation as observed in the cross-section data. While finite-range and other effects may slightly alter the results obtained One of the interesting aspects of the passage of ions through solids is the possibility of residual excitation in the electronic orbitals of the projec-with the above DWBA calculations and hence the absolute S a values , 8 they are not expected to change the systematic features shown in Fig. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The calculations are normalized such that S a = 1.0 for 20 Ne(d, 6 Li) 16 O at E d = 35 MeV.^9 As anticipated, the S a values show the same odd-even variation as observed in the cross-section data. While finite-range and other effects may slightly alter the results obtained One of the interesting aspects of the passage of ions through solids is the possibility of residual excitation in the electronic orbitals of the projec-with the above DWBA calculations and hence the absolute S a values , 8 they are not expected to change the systematic features shown in Fig. 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It has been observed that the target K-shell ionization cross sections increase with the projectile charge state, the rate of increase being larger when the projectile has two or less electrons [8,21], and for near symmetric collisions [22]. Two main factors may be responsible for this dependence which is still not fully understood: a reduced screening of the projectile for higher charge states and transfer to the projectile of target K-shell electrons.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There is no direct measurement of the charge-state effect for the systems studied here; nevertheless an estimation can be made from known results. By extrapolation of the results obtained with S and CI projectiles on targets ranging from Ne to Ar [22], the increase in the cross sections due to charge state effects can be estimated to be by a factor of only about 2.…”
Section: Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following momentum analysis they were passed through thin (10-20gg/cm 2) C foils and pure charge states were magnetically selected and focussed through a double differentially pumped gas cell apparatus [6]. A Si(Li)-detector with an active area of 80 mm 2 and a 0.0125ram Be entrance window was used detect the target (Ar) K and the Cu L x-rays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%