2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.094017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C-parameter distribution atN3LLincluding power corrections

Abstract: We compute the e + e − C-parameter distribution using the Soft-Collinear Effective Theory with a resummation to N 3 LL accuracy of the most singular partonic terms. This includes the known fixed-order QCD results up to O(α 3 s ), a numerical determination of the two loop non-logarithmic term of the soft function, and all logarithmic terms in the jet and soft functions up to three loops. Our result holds for C in the peak, tail, and far tail regions. Additionally, we treat hadronization effects using a field th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
131
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
8
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…-56 - shape using LEP data, and including power corrections and hadron mass effects [91,92], gives a value of Ω D = 0.28 GeV [160,161]. This agrees well with our values extracted through comparison with Monte Carlo.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)117supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-56 - shape using LEP data, and including power corrections and hadron mass effects [91,92], gives a value of Ω D = 0.28 GeV [160,161]. This agrees well with our values extracted through comparison with Monte Carlo.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)117supporting
confidence: 80%
“…We refer the reader to, for example, refs. [83,84,[156][157][158][159][160][161] and references therein.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)117mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this work was being finalised ref. [62] appeared, where an analytic resummation for the C parameter is presented. We compared their formulae to our analytic result for the C parameter, and found full agreement at NNLL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed a natural generalization of those used for massless event shapes in Ref. [32], to which they reduce in the massless limit [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%