1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.50.2205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H3(α,γ)7Li

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
111
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
111
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A precise new measurement of the cross section for this process has been completed by Brune et al [14] in the time since the publication of SKM. Some subsequent calculations have incorporated the reaction rate derived from that measurement by its authors (e.g., Copi et al [1]), using as the uncertainty the 6% uncertainty in the experiment's cross section normalization.…”
Section: T(α γ) 7 LImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A precise new measurement of the cross section for this process has been completed by Brune et al [14] in the time since the publication of SKM. Some subsequent calculations have incorporated the reaction rate derived from that measurement by its authors (e.g., Copi et al [1]), using as the uncertainty the 6% uncertainty in the experiment's cross section normalization.…”
Section: T(α γ) 7 LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some subsequent BBN calculations (e.g., Ref. [1]) have incorporated the latest measurement of t(α, γ) 7 Li [14] by replacing the SKM fit with a reaction rate and uncertainty based on that measurement alone. These numbers have not found their way into all subsequent work (e.g., Ref.…”
Section: A the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, our calculations used the SKM rates, with α variation estimated as described above, and with updates from Refs. [27,28,29]. We compared a calculation using these rates and α BBN = α 0 with the corresponding results from the NACRE [30] and Nollett & Burles [31] evaluations of the rates (which are not suited to computing α variation).…”
Section: Laboratory Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time since SKM (1993), some of the most uncertain cross sections have been remeasured. Newer, better rates exist for the processes d(p, γ) 3 He [26,27], t(α, γ) 7 Li [28], and 3 He(n, p) 3 H [29]. The revised rate for the first reaction has the usual functional form derived by the S-factor formalism (though its parameters are actually fitted to a numerical integration), and the expression from BIR, as corrected in Sec.…”
Section: Laboratory Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%