1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.151.930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(t,He4) Reaction on the Even Ni Isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is what would be expected if dipole absorption proceeds through doorway states with a width of a few MeV. In view of the relative constancy of the product of the particle emission probability and the El-factor for the fv/2 nuclides, it is interesting to note the drastic difference between the products for d-wave protons proton hole is found at an excitation energy of 1.7 MeV in 58Ni [39] while, instead of being larger, it is at only 0.5 MeV in 63Cu [38], Provided the ds/2 proton particle states behave normally, one would therefore expect the differences between the P3/2 hole state and the ds/2 particle states to be appreciably smaller in 63Cu than in 58Ni. The (P3/2)-l(ds/2) +l state should therefore be found at a lower energy in 63Cu than in 58Ni, indicating that quite different parts of the corresponding resonances are excited in the two nuclides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is what would be expected if dipole absorption proceeds through doorway states with a width of a few MeV. In view of the relative constancy of the product of the particle emission probability and the El-factor for the fv/2 nuclides, it is interesting to note the drastic difference between the products for d-wave protons proton hole is found at an excitation energy of 1.7 MeV in 58Ni [39] while, instead of being larger, it is at only 0.5 MeV in 63Cu [38], Provided the ds/2 proton particle states behave normally, one would therefore expect the differences between the P3/2 hole state and the ds/2 particle states to be appreciably smaller in 63Cu than in 58Ni. The (P3/2)-l(ds/2) +l state should therefore be found at a lower energy in 63Cu than in 58Ni, indicating that quite different parts of the corresponding resonances are excited in the two nuclides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The energy levels and J~-assignments are from [40,45]. Spectroscopic factors are from [38] and those denoted by an asterisk are from [39] and Ep = 6.98 MeV are clearly seen in Fig. 4a.…”
Section: Sni( 7 P)57comentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation for 'jlCo is performed by diagonali~ng HpTqM in the standard quasiparticle-phonon basis (-1)r'iJ5(2j+1)(2j'+i)~ '0 i_t)*j(Uj';p+Uj,Uj), (11) Here, c& is the particle creation operator; b,+ is the creation operator of the quadrupole phonon ; of is the occupation probability for the quasiparticle state l_j") and us = 1 -2:; ; fi = x,b,f b, and N is the maximum number of phonons included in the con~guration space. The parameter y0 stands for y0 = Ta (s-r), where To is the interaction strength and (s-i) is the average value of the energy denominators which in RPA correspond to the quasiparticle states 17) and 17).…”
Section: Energy Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When direct decay occurs, the daughter nuclei should be left in proton hole states, since giant resonances are thought of being coherent superpositions of 1-particle-l-hole configurations. Proton hole states with spectroscopic factors not too low (~ 1/10 of the sum rule value 2j + 1) as known from 5SNi(d,3He) [13], 8~ [14] and 64Zn(d,3He) [15] are shown schematically in Fig.2, the most prominent of them represented by extended bars. In each case the observed non-statistical part closely resembles the features of the respective hole strength distribution: for the Co-Isotopes strength is concentrated in the lf7/2 ground state and a structure around 3 MeV (2sl/2, ld3/2), in S3Cn one observes a stronger fragmentation into various low lying states and a broad cluster of 2sl/2 and lf7/2 states centered at 4 MeV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%