2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.107.064303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

B(E2) anomaly cannot be explained with O(6) higher-order interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this point can be better understood from the above discussions. It has been pointed out above that triaxial deformation cannot be produced in the O(6) limit up to the fourth-order interactions as adopted in [45]. Meanwhile, it is also shown here that adding the higher-order terms like ( ) • ( )…”
Section: Numerical Examination Of the O(6) Imagementioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this point can be better understood from the above discussions. It has been pointed out above that triaxial deformation cannot be produced in the O(6) limit up to the fourth-order interactions as adopted in [45]. Meanwhile, it is also shown here that adding the higher-order terms like ( ) • ( )…”
Section: Numerical Examination Of the O(6) Imagementioning
confidence: 53%
“…A key factor of generating B(E2) anomaly characterized by B 42 < 1.0 in the SU(3) limit is to introduce symmetry-conserving high-order terms [12,44]. In contrast, the recent analysis given in [45] indicates that the O(6) Hamiltonian similar to that used in the SU(3) scheme [44] cannot bring B(E2) anomaly in yrast states. In fact, this point can be better understood from the above discussions.…”
Section: Numerical Examination Of the O(6) Imagementioning
confidence: 99%