MMPI-based personality types among juvenile sexual offenders

Smith, May.; Monastersky, Caren; Deisher, Robert M.

doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198707)43:4<422::aid-jclp2270430414>3.0.co;2-3

Cited by 64 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A basic dichotomy between those who victimize adults and those who victimize children has found empirical support among adult sex offender samples, with differences in personality, offense dynamics, and rates of recidivism (Barbaree, Seto, Serin, Amos, & Preston, 1994;Firestone, Bradford, Greenberg, & Serran, 2000;Porter et al, 2000;Prentky, Lee, Knight, & Cerce, 1997;Quinsey, Rice, & Harris, 1995;Segal & Marshall, 1985a, 1985bSerin, Malcolm, Khanna, & Barbaree, 1994;Valliant, Gauthier, Pottier, & Kosmyna, 2000). The same distinction between those who have victimized children and those who have victimized adults or same age peers has been explored among juvenile sex offender samples with mixed results on various individual factors, historical factors, and offense dynamics (Awad & Saunders, 1991;Carpenter, Peed, & Eastman, 1995;Ford & Linney, 1995;Graves, Openshaw, Ascione, & Ericksen, 1996;Hsu & Starzynski, 1990;Hunter et al, 2003;Richardson, Kelly, Bhate, & Graham, 1997;Saunders, Awad, & White, 1986;Smith, Monastersky, & Deisher, 1987;Worling, 1995Worling, , 2001.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Factors for Adolescent Sex Offender Recidivism: Evaluation of Predictive Factors and Comparison of Three Groups Based Upon Victim Type

Parks

Bard

2006

Sex Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated differences in recidivism risk factors and traits associated with psychopathy among 3 groups of male adolescent sexual offenders (N=156): offenders against children, offenders against peers or adults, and mixed type offenders. Furthermore, those same variables were examined for their association with sexual and nonsexual recidivism and the 3 groups were compared for differences in rates of recidivism. Based upon both juvenile and adult recidivism data, 6.4% of the sample reoffended sexually and 30.1% reoffended nonsexually. Retrospective risk assessments were completed using the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (JSOAP-II) and the Psychopathy Checklist:Youth Version (PCL:YV). Comparisons of the 3 preexisting groups for differences on scale and factor scores were conducted using analyses of variance (ANOVAs). Differences among groups for recidivism were measured using survival curve analysis. Associations between risk scales and recidivism were measured using Cox regression analyses. Results suggest significant differences among the 3 offender groups on multiple scales of the JSOAP-II and PCL:YV, with mixed type offenders consistently producing higher risk scores as compared to those who exclusively offend against children or peers/adults. The Impulsive/Antisocial Behavior scale of the JSOAP-II and the Interpersonal and Antisocial factors of the PCL:YV were significant predictors of sexual recidivism. The Behavioral and Antisocial factors of the PCL:YV were significant predictors of nonsexual recidivism. Results supported previous research indicating that most adolescents who sexually offend do not continue offending into adulthood. Such results can lead to improved treatment by targeting specific risk factors for intervention and better use of risk management resources in the community, while preserving the most restrictive treatment options for the highest risk offenders.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk Factors for Adolescent Sex Offender Recidivism: Evaluation of Predictive Factors and Comparison of Three Groups Based Upon Victim Type

Parks

Bard

2006

Sex Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the substantial literature evaluating psychopathology of adult sex offenders (e.g., Duthey & McIvor, 1990;Erickson, Luxenberg, Walbek, & Seely, 1987), it is not surprising that researchers have started investigating personality characteristics and psychopathology of JSOs (Cooper et al, 1996;Smith et al, 1987;Truscott, 1993). Current studies suggest that JSOs demonstrate more psychological disturbances than expected (Cooper et al, 1996), and that there may be subtypes of JSOs based on psychological presentation (Smith et al, 1987).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Personality Characteristics of Juvenile Sex Offenders and Non-Sex Offending Delinquent Peers: A Preliminary Investigation

Freeman

Dexter-Mazza²,

Hoffman

2005

Sex Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There exists a paucity of research on psychopathology among Juvenile Sex Offenders (JSOs) as measured by standardized instruments, particularly as compared to nonclinical and other clinical populations. The current investigation involved a comparison of scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Adolescent Version (MMPI-A) between a group of JSOs and non-sex offending delinquent peers. Thirty-six youth from a staff-secure residential facilitate participated, 18 JSOs and 18 non-sex offending delinquent peers. Results revealed that the mean score on clinical Scale 4 (Psychopathic Deviant) was in the clinically significant range for non-sex offending peers and not for JSOs, although the difference between the mean scores was not statistically significant. Chi-square analysis indicated that a significantly greater number of non-sex offending delinquents had scores in the clinical range on this scale as compared to JSOs. Results are discussed in the context of current research on psychopathology among JSOs.

show abstract

“…Smith, Monastersky and Deisher (1987) and Worling (2001) represent two exceptions to this trend. Using different methodologies both studies identified four personality-based subgroups within their populations of juvenile sexual abusers: anti-social/impulsive; unusual/isolated; overcontrolled/reserved; and confident/aggressive (Worling, 2001).…”

Section: Typologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Links Between Juvenile Sexually Abusive Behaviour and Emerging Severe Personality Disorder Traits in Childhood

Hickey¹,

Vizard²,

McCrory³

et al. 2006

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Young people presenting with sexually abusive behaviour (SAB) -juvenile sexual abusers (JSAs) -are responsible for a significant minority of sexual offences against children and adults (Home Office, 2003). A detailed study of 280 JSAs referred to a specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service was conducted in order to provide a detailed description of this population. Data were obtained from a retrospective file review, and the Offenders Index. Two theoretical questions were addressed.Firstly, whether the age of onset of SAB could distinguish distinct subgroups of JSAs. Such categories have proved clinically relevant for generally anti-social juveniles (Moffitt, 1993). Early Onset (n=93) and Late Onset (n=120) groups were identified depending on whether SAB began before or after the age of 11. The results indicated that the Early Onset group were more likely to experience: inadequate family sexual boundaries; multiple forms of abuse; poorer parenting; and insecure attachment. The Late Onset group tended to misuse substances, sexually abuse specific groups, and were more likely to use verbal coercion.Secondly, whether a distinct subgroup of juvenile sexual abusers could be identified on the basis of emerging severe personality disorder (ESPD) traits. An ESPD group (n=54) presenting with marked conduct disorder and psychopathic personality disorder traits was compared with a non-ESPD group of JSAs (n=149). The results indicated that the ESPD group was more likely to have: an early difficult temperament; more insecure attachment; inconsistent parenting; placement disruption; and parents with mental health problems. Their SAB was more predatory and premeditated. Notably, their 'lifetime' conviction rate for all offences was 67 per cent compared to 37 per cent in the non-ESPD group.Clinical, policy and research implications are discussed. The need for JSA specialist services, integrated governmental approaches, and research on treatment efficacy, and ESPD traits in childhood are highlighted.

show abstract

MMPI-based personality types among juvenile sexual offenders

Cited by 64 publications

References 15 publications

Risk Factors for Adolescent Sex Offender Recidivism: Evaluation of Predictive Factors and Comparison of Three Groups Based Upon Victim Type

Risk Factors for Adolescent Sex Offender Recidivism: Evaluation of Predictive Factors and Comparison of Three Groups Based Upon Victim Type

Comparing Personality Characteristics of Juvenile Sex Offenders and Non-Sex Offending Delinquent Peers: A Preliminary Investigation

Links Between Juvenile Sexually Abusive Behaviour and Emerging Severe Personality Disorder Traits in Childhood

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About