2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018ja025244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMS/FEEPS Observations of Electron Microinjections Due to Kelvin‐Helmholtz Waves and Flux Transfer Events: A Case Study

Abstract: The Energetic Particle Detector (EPD) suite onboard the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft observes dispersive and repetitive fluxes of high‐energy (50–400 keV) electrons within the Pc5 frequency band (2–8 MHz) in the dusk to midnight region of Earth's magnetotail. These microinjections are a new phenomenon in this region of the magnetosphere, presently poorly understood, but clearly a new signature that remotely senses large‐scale magnetospheric boundary dynamics. It is therefore important to understa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example of a science campaign, we build upon a recent MMS discovery of micro-injections at the dusk flank MP in conjunction with ULF wave activity ( Fennell et al, 2016 ). Simulations proposed that Kelvin-Helmholtz waves (KHWs) on the MP surface were the cause ( Kavosi et al, 2018 ). To gain more insight into this multi-scale process, one could create event classifiers for micro-injections ( Claudepierre et al, 2020 ), field line resonances, and KHWs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of a science campaign, we build upon a recent MMS discovery of micro-injections at the dusk flank MP in conjunction with ULF wave activity ( Fennell et al, 2016 ). Simulations proposed that Kelvin-Helmholtz waves (KHWs) on the MP surface were the cause ( Kavosi et al, 2018 ). To gain more insight into this multi-scale process, one could create event classifiers for micro-injections ( Claudepierre et al, 2020 ), field line resonances, and KHWs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses OMNI solar wind and IMF data downloaded from https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov (King & Papitashvili, ) as the model input. OpenGGCM can be used as a stand‐alone model (Raeder et al, ) or coupled with Rice Convection Model (Cramer et al, ), Coupled Thermosphere‐ Ionosphere Model (Connor et al, , ; Ferdousi & Raeder, ; Jensen et al, ; Oliveira & Raeder, ; Raeder et al, ), and a full particle tracing code (Connor et al, , ; Kavosi et al, ). Here, we used the stand‐alone version.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we used the stand-alone OpenGGCM model. Details of OpenGGCM and its applications to the geospace environment can be found in Raeder et al (2001aRaeder et al ( , 2008, Connor et al (2012Connor et al ( , 2014Connor et al ( , 2015Connor et al ( , 2016, Oliveira and Raeder (2015), Ferdousi and Raeder (2016), Cramer et al (2017), Jensen et al (2017), Shi et al (2017), and Kavosi et al (2018).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%