2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MnO2 grown in situ on graphene@CNTs as electrode materials for supercapacitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That shows researchers the possibility of replacing RuO 2 with MnO 2 . However, MnO 2 cannot satisfy large-scale commercial applications due to its poor conductivity 17,18 and small specic surface area. 19 Therefore, numerous approaches are undertaken to improve the specic capacitance of MnO 2 as an electrode, such as forming a composite electrode with conductive substrates, 20,21 making atomic defects 22,23 and modications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That shows researchers the possibility of replacing RuO 2 with MnO 2 . However, MnO 2 cannot satisfy large-scale commercial applications due to its poor conductivity 17,18 and small specic surface area. 19 Therefore, numerous approaches are undertaken to improve the specic capacitance of MnO 2 as an electrode, such as forming a composite electrode with conductive substrates, 20,21 making atomic defects 22,23 and modications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique forest-like structure of a MWNT sets up a conductive network which greatly improves the electronic conductivity of the MnO 2 –MWNT–Ni foam [29]. Figure 2a demonstrates SEM images of the MnO 2 nanoflake film on the Ni foam surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those bands mainly correspond to coated PANI on the surface of reduced graphene sheets. The intensity ratio of I D /I G indicates the degree of graphitization and defect level . The intensity ratios of I D /I G of GH, GH/SWCNTs and GH/SWCNTs/PANI were 1.16, 1.15, 0.98, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%