2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MO-MCS, a Derivative-Free Algorithm for the Multiobjective Optimization of Adsorption Processes

Abstract: Cyclic adsorption processes for gas separation, such as pressure and temperature swing adsorption (PSA and TSA), are non-stationary multi-column processes. Their design involves many degrees of freedom, which offers a very high flexibility while calling for a systematic and rigorous optimization approach. As an additional challenge, optimization of these separation processes involves multiple objectives, e.g. minimal energy demand and maximal productivity, which have to be pursued while fulfilling given proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of the class of problem, optimizing adsorption processes require employing derivative-free optimization methods due to the nonlinear and nonconvex nature of the objectives and the constraints, if any, imposed on the process. 39,47 In this work, we employ two different derivative-free optimization methods with single and multiple objectives to optimize the process configurations. We use a single objective optimization method to optimize the superstructure, presented in Section 3.3 (see Section 4.2.2).…”
Section: Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of the class of problem, optimizing adsorption processes require employing derivative-free optimization methods due to the nonlinear and nonconvex nature of the objectives and the constraints, if any, imposed on the process. 39,47 In this work, we employ two different derivative-free optimization methods with single and multiple objectives to optimize the process configurations. We use a single objective optimization method to optimize the superstructure, presented in Section 3.3 (see Section 4.2.2).…”
Section: Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-step approach was used for process optimization (for more details, the reader is referred to [14]). First, the feasibility of the separation was assessed by mathematically optimizing (using the multiobjective optimization routine described elsewhere [34]) the purity and recovery of H 2 while constraining purity and recovery of CO 2 to 96% and 90%, respectively (the requirements typically set for CO 2 capture and storage [35,36,37]). After this feasibility analysis, the material or the process configuration may be revisited for improvements.…”
Section: Process Modelling and Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the technological process of air separation and oxygen concentration by the PSA method [13,14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] allowed to determine:…”
Section: Mathematical Description Of Pressure Swing Adsorption Procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [34] has applied a simultaneous tailored methods approach for the solution of the optimization problem, which is more economical in the sense of reducing the time spent on obtaining a solution. However, in the majority of other works [19,21,[35][36][37] optimization problems were solved with the use of the so-called black-box approach, which is widely used both for solving practical and scientific problems [34,38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%