2016
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201600025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MoV Reagents in Organic Synthesis

Abstract: The use of Mo V reagents, and in particular MoCl 5 , in organic synthesis is surveyed. The oxidative treatment of aromatic substrates is the most common application. The unique properties of these reagents are due to their high oxidative power combined with exquisite Lewis acid properties. In several examples Mo V reagents outperform other common oxidative coupling reagents. C-C bond formation through inter-and intramolecular oxidative coupling can lead to selective formation of five-to eight-membered ring sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We presumed that readily available chrysene derivatives[18a] could be converted into tetrabenzo[ a , cd , h , jk ]pyrenes by using the ubiquitous Scholl‐type oxidative coupling reaction (Scheme 1). In the event, the attempted cyclisation of 1a , 2a and 4a (see the Supporting Information for details), by using either FeCl 3 or MoCl 5 , resulted in the generation of intractable reaction mixtures, whereas those utilising DDQ/MeSO 3 H were much better behaved. Although this reagent combination apparently allowed the reaction to proceed with discrete C–C bond formation for substrates 1a and 4a , it was a process, which was again marred, in a practical sense, as product formation was also accompanied by irreproducible levels of mesylate incorporation…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We presumed that readily available chrysene derivatives[18a] could be converted into tetrabenzo[ a , cd , h , jk ]pyrenes by using the ubiquitous Scholl‐type oxidative coupling reaction (Scheme 1). In the event, the attempted cyclisation of 1a , 2a and 4a (see the Supporting Information for details), by using either FeCl 3 or MoCl 5 , resulted in the generation of intractable reaction mixtures, whereas those utilising DDQ/MeSO 3 H were much better behaved. Although this reagent combination apparently allowed the reaction to proceed with discrete C–C bond formation for substrates 1a and 4a , it was a process, which was again marred, in a practical sense, as product formation was also accompanied by irreproducible levels of mesylate incorporation…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, the next few described reactions focus on the electrochemical homocoupling reactions of arenes bearing hydroxyl groups at the aromatic compound. Here, one of the most powerful classes of reagents for the dehydrogenative coupling of aryls is represented by Mo­(V) reagents. However, they have to be used in a stoichiometric manner which is not sustainable. When using molybdenum as an anode in HFIP a compact, conductive, and electroactive layer of higher valent molybdenum species is formed (see Scheme ).…”
Section: Aryl–aryl Bond Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we first utilized FeCl 3 in this reaction as an oxidant; however, no coupling product was detected, and most bisBODIPY 4a was decomposed (Table S1). MoCl 5 has been reported as an excellent single-electron oxidant that could be employed in several oxidative arylation reactions. , BisBODIPY 4a was then subjected to the MoCl 5 -promoted oxidative reaction. Interestingly, a slightly more polar cyan product (vs 4a ) was formed rapidly, which was further confirmed to be the directly fused bisBODIPY 5a by single-crystal X-ray analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%