2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOA-2011-BLG-293Lb: A TEST OF PURE SURVEY MICROLENSING PLANET DETECTIONS

Abstract: Because of the development of large-format, wide-field cameras, microlensing surveys are now able to monitor millions of stars with sufficient cadence to detect planets. These new discoveries will span the full range of significance levels including planetary signals too small to be distinguished from the noise. At present, we do not understand where the threshold is for detecting planets. MOA-2011-BLG-293Lb is the first planet to be published from the new surveys, and it also has substantial followup observat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
176
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
176
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the lens system is very likely to be in the Galactic bulge. Penny et al (2016) (Rattenbury et al 2015), and MOA-2011-BLG-293L (Yee et al 2012;Batista et al 2014). Actually, the problem with the Penny et al (2016) analysis is pretty easy to understand.…”
Section: Lens Properties and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that the lens system is very likely to be in the Galactic bulge. Penny et al (2016) (Rattenbury et al 2015), and MOA-2011-BLG-293L (Yee et al 2012;Batista et al 2014). Actually, the problem with the Penny et al (2016) analysis is pretty easy to understand.…”
Section: Lens Properties and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These error-bar estimates are good measures of the relative uncertainties for measurements with the same telescope, but they are often wrong by a factor of ∼2 (Yee et al 2012). To determine the uncertainties for the model parameters, it is necessary to have accurate error bars that will give c » dof 1 2 for each data set.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this readjustment, we follow the standard procedure of Yee et al (2012), where the error bars are renormalized by…”
Section: Observation and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photometry of the data were conducted using the pipelines developed by the individual groups based on the difference imaging analysis method (Alard & Lupton 1998;Bramich et al 2013). Since the data sets were taken using different instruments and reduced based on different software, we normalize the error bars of the individual data sets using the method described in Yee et al (2012). According to this method, error bars are rescaled by the relation k 0 2 min…”
Section: Observations and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%