Praxiswissen Wirtschaftsmediation 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-32797-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobbing in Organisationen. Hintergründe, Ursachen, Bearbeitungsoptionen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[38][39][40] We can only speculate on the mechanisms responsible of the Rabl-like configuration in marsupials as the function of this chromosome pattern still remains a mystery since its initial first cytological description. 41 Although speculative, it is possible that the Rabl configuration is a relic from anaphase-segregating chromosomes. 42 In this case, larger/longer chromosomes would establish a polarized pattern more readily during interphase with size and the heterochromatin distribution favoring a Rabl configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] We can only speculate on the mechanisms responsible of the Rabl-like configuration in marsupials as the function of this chromosome pattern still remains a mystery since its initial first cytological description. 41 Although speculative, it is possible that the Rabl configuration is a relic from anaphase-segregating chromosomes. 42 In this case, larger/longer chromosomes would establish a polarized pattern more readily during interphase with size and the heterochromatin distribution favoring a Rabl configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these are, de facto, distinct proteins, having different ligands, it is conceptually correct to use two distinct FFs and to perform LD simulation started from A using FF B to reproduce the A→B transition occurring upon Ca 2+ binding, and, vice-versa, using FF A for the B→A inverse transition occurring upon Ca 2+ release. A few data are available for the difference in Gibbs free energy between the folded and denatured proteins ranging between ΔG A ~1.5-3.5 32,33 kcal/mole for the A state and ΔG B ~4.5-6.5 kcal/mole for the B state 33 . Energy alignment is not straightforward, however, one might assume the denatured state as reference, and infer that B state is more stable than A of about 2-4 kcal/mole.…”
Section: Molecular Dynamics Of the Open-closed Transition Of Calmodulinmentioning
confidence: 99%