1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01245520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile and stationary phases for SFC: Effects of using modifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, D is the distribution coefficient, c s and c m are the concentrations of a solute (mg mL −1 ) in the stationary and mobile phases, and β is the ratio of stationary to mobile phase volumes [19].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, D is the distribution coefficient, c s and c m are the concentrations of a solute (mg mL −1 ) in the stationary and mobile phases, and β is the ratio of stationary to mobile phase volumes [19].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They confirmed that the introduction of low concentrations of modifiers into C02 affects retention of solutes by deactivating the residual silanol groups on the stationary phase. In a later paper, they evaluated and ranked polarity, density, deactivation, solvation, and swelling effects (94). They also evaluated methods of estimating critical properties and densities of mixed fluids.…”
Section: Mobile Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%