2016
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile-Based Nutrition and Child Health Monitoring to Inform Program Development: An Experience From Liberia

Abstract: Monitoring behavior using mobile phones at food distribution points allowed managers to rapidly adapt project activities. Self-reported breastfeeding, complementary feeding, and use of insecticide-treated nets improved. Applying the same methodology at the household level proved unsuccessful.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) With regards to the research design, five were descriptive, (17,(20)(21)(22)(23) one qualitative, (18) one methodological, (19) one experimental without randomization, (25) and the other experimental with randomization. (24) The predominant level of evidence was four, (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) followed by three, (25) and two. (24) The methodological analysis of rigor focused on level A, (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and only one on B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) With regards to the research design, five were descriptive, (17,(20)(21)(22)(23) one qualitative, (18) one methodological, (19) one experimental without randomization, (25) and the other experimental with randomization. (24) The predominant level of evidence was four, (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) followed by three, (25) and two. (24) The methodological analysis of rigor focused on level A, (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and only one on B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24) The predominant level of evidence was four, (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) followed by three, (25) and two. (24) The methodological analysis of rigor focused on level A, (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and only one on B. (17) The studies were published between 2015-2017, in the English language, in periodicals of the United States, (16,17,(20)(21)(22) United Kingdom, (23,24) and Australia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations