2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40141-019-00240-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Health Interventions for Traumatic Brain Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we cannot make recommendations as to the optimal content, timing, or mHealth platform for capturing accurate information and avoiding participant fatigue. However, personalization is a consistent theme across studies in this review and past studies on mHealth use after ABI [ 20 , 28 ], and individual differences will likely require personalized approaches that pair mHealth technology with unique needs and abilities of each person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, we cannot make recommendations as to the optimal content, timing, or mHealth platform for capturing accurate information and avoiding participant fatigue. However, personalization is a consistent theme across studies in this review and past studies on mHealth use after ABI [ 20 , 28 ], and individual differences will likely require personalized approaches that pair mHealth technology with unique needs and abilities of each person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To date, though, there is limited evidence to support the efficacy of mHealth technologies to improve functional outcomes following an ABI [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. While thousands of mHealth applications are currently available for download, fewer than 1% of these are grounded in evidence-based knowledge [ 15 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though the majority of the studies were small, seven of the studies reported significant findings, concluding that: (a) stroke- and TBI-related apps can, in some cases, effectively replace paper-based screening and assessment tools (Choi et al., 2015); (b) some stroke- and TBI-related education apps designed with a client-focused approach demonstrate high usability; and (c) some apps that provide patient interventions can significantly improve functional outcomes and self-management skills (De Joode et al., 2013; Paul et al., 2016; Pavliscsak et al., 2016). A quick review published in 2019 on mHealth technology use after TBI yielded similar results, concluding that mHealth apps can provide cognitive strategy techniques for monitoring and reducing symptoms, and effectively augment education and self-management, but that research was still predominantly limited to developmental and small pilot studies (Juengst et al., 2019a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%