2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05561-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile health technologies for the management of rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of online stores in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile health technologies are a means to reach a large population of people with osteoarthritis, especially those outside of urban areas ( 49 ). Telehealth has been used in South Africa since the 1970s, but only for certain conditions and regions ( 50 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile health technologies are a means to reach a large population of people with osteoarthritis, especially those outside of urban areas ( 49 ). Telehealth has been used in South Africa since the 1970s, but only for certain conditions and regions ( 50 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays many studies focus on the evaluation of medical apps in order to understand whether the developers use a validated scientific approach to their creation (20)(21)(22). Although a standardized evaluation method does not exist, a reasonable way to qualify those apps is to combine different scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An integrative, holistic treatment approach might improve patients' quality of life. Due to the wide adoption of smartphones (1), medical apps could become an effective tool (2)(3)(4)(5) to promote predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory ("P4") medicine (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile apps created for patient use are currently primarily assessed exclusively by physicians (4,5), yet it has been repeatedly stressed to include end-user (patient) evaluations (1,4,(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%