2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile Learning in Health-Related Disciplines (2009–2018): A Review of Case Studies with the FRAME Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show the emerging trends of the features of smart learning reported in the literature, such as collaborative learning, adaptivity, self-regulated learning, experience-based learning and ubiquitous learning. Such features are not unique to smart learning but are highly interrelated with that widely shown in other technology-enhanced learning approaches such as personalised learning (Li & Wong, 2019a) and mobile learning (Li & Wong, 2019b). Although it is common for educational practices to incorporate various approaches, the interrelationship between smart learning and other related approachestheoretically, conceptually, methodologically and empiricallyshould be an important area for future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results show the emerging trends of the features of smart learning reported in the literature, such as collaborative learning, adaptivity, self-regulated learning, experience-based learning and ubiquitous learning. Such features are not unique to smart learning but are highly interrelated with that widely shown in other technology-enhanced learning approaches such as personalised learning (Li & Wong, 2019a) and mobile learning (Li & Wong, 2019b). Although it is common for educational practices to incorporate various approaches, the interrelationship between smart learning and other related approachestheoretically, conceptually, methodologically and empiricallyshould be an important area for future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%